The Mississippi State Preview
General Overview
The Crimson Tide will travel to Starkville to take on the Mississippi State Bulldogs at 11:30 this Saturday, in what will be the 92nd meeting in what has turned into a mini-rivalry. It's nowhere near a true rivalry given the current and historical disparities between the two schools, but the schools are geographically close and the ties between the two programs run deep. State's best coach of all was arguably Jackie Sherrill, a Bryant pupil who starred on national championship teams as a player in Tuscaloosa. The same goes for current Bulldog coach Sylvester Croom. Moreover, Alabama frequently goes into Mississippi and takes away several top players, and that only further fuels the rivalry.
The upcoming match-up is not one without implications, either. The Bulldogs were expected to be terrible yet again this season, and looked that way early on, but have fought hard and are currently just one win away from becoming bowl eligible, and at this point it seems like they'll get it. A win against Alabama would likely, at the very least, secure them a trip to Shreveport. Alabama, on the other hand, is already bowl eligible, but it's still an important game for the Tide. An absolute collapse for the Tide (somewhere in the neighborhood of 7-5) would likely end up in Nashville, but if the Tide wins out it could land up in the Cotton Bowl or something similar. Obviously, both sides have a lot to play for.
And you should expect both teams to likely come out playing hard. Mississippi State is fresh off of a bye week, and the game remains extremely important to Croom. Even though Shula is gone, Alabama is still Croom's alma mater, and despite all he may say about maroon, the man bleeds crimson and white and wanted the Alabama job desperately. The mere fact that he did not get it, and apparently will never get it, must haunt him considering how close he was, and it would mean a lot to him, and by extension to his players, to knock off the Tide. Alabama, on the other hand, remains haunted by the embarrassing loss at home to the Bulldogs. The loss stung at the time, and still does. For better or for worse, that loss is what directly led to Shula's dismissal, and to be quite frank it was the defining moment of his career at Alabama. No other game summed up the underlying problems of the Shula regime than the 2006 MSU game. Alabama players would likely like little more than to remove that game from their psyche once and for all with a dominating win.
Though not the sexiest match-up on the 2007 slate, it's a very meaningful game for both sides.
Alabama Offense v. Mississippi State Defense
With little doubt, the Bulldog defense is the strength of their squad, and its one of the better defenses in the conference. To be sure, they've had some struggles at times -- Tennessee and South Carolina both had good days against them, and West Virginia made them look pathetic -- but as a whole this is a good defense that limits what you can do. They gave LSU trouble in the opener, and completely shut down Auburn and Kentucky. They haven't been the most consistent bunch around, but it's a good unit.
And the key to this Mississippi State defense is turnovers. If you look at their raw rankings, they aren't particularly good. They are tied for eighth in the conference in scoring defense, fifth in pass defense, and eighth in rushing defense. The key has largely been turnovers, and when at its best, this unit has created them in bunches. They forced five turnovers against Auburn, and then six against Kentucky. It was that led them to their ultimate victory in both games.
The defense is led by defensive end Titus Brown. Most would argue that Brown -- a native of Tuscaloosa, who went to Tuscaloosa's Central High, literally three blocks away from Bryant-Denny Stadium -- is the best defensive end in the conference, and it's not hard to make a convincing case. He's tied for the league lead in sacks, and he's just all over the field. Some teams have found ways to slow him this year, but he's just one of the best around, no two ways about it.
The key to Alabama on the offensive side of the ball will be protecting the football. You can run against this team, and you should be able to throw against them as long as we can hold up fairly well against Brown. We definitely have an advantage in skill players. However, Brown will be very tough to block -- especially considering he's likely to be lined up over Mike Johnson -- and the Bulldogs will pressure the quarterback and try to create turnovers. And unfortunately, John Parker Wilson has been about as adept at protecting the football as the Fat One has been at sticking to diet plans. The harsh truth is that it's not either's strong point.
Again, all in all, 'Bama should be able to move the football relatively well against the Bulldogs, and should be able to score some points. But the Bulldogs can force turnovers and they do so in droves. If we cannot protect the football against them -- like Auburn and Kentucky could not -- it's going to be a long day. It will limit the possessions to the point where we don't score many points, and it will put the Bulldogs in position to score easy points. You do the math on that one. Don't forget, the back-breaker in Tuscaloosa a year ago was a John Parker Wilson interception that was returned for a touchdown by Quinton Culbertson when the Tide was driving for a game-tying score just before halftime.
Simply put, protect the football, protect the football, protect the football. If we do those things, we should be okay on offense.
Alabama Defense v. Mississippi State Offense
The State offense, while perhaps a bit better than the past few years, is still not particularly good. They are currently tenth in scoring offense, tenth in rushing offense, and tenth in passer efficiency. You never want to belittle an opponent, but the harsh truth of the matter for the Bulldogs is that their offense will be one of the worst we face all year long.
Wesley Carroll, a true freshman, has taken over at quarterback after injuries to the two players in front of him, and he's done relatively well I suppose. Being brutally frank, though, he hasn't exactly done a whole lot, except one thing. He's completing a low percentage of his passes, and his low yards per completion and attempt indicates that he's throwing a lot of short throws, which of course makes the low completion percentage all the more damning. Moreover, he obviously cannot stretch the field vertically, with only two completions going for more than 22 yards.
What Carroll does, however, is protect the football. And he does a damn good job of that. He's thrown 137 passes this year, and his zero interceptions. That has broken the Mississippi State record. And he doesn't get sacked much either, with a sack rate of only 4.3 per cent. So, he doesn't make very many plays, but on the other hand he doesn't create many negative plays, and that really can create some problems for you. At times, it's amazing how difficult you can make things for your opponent when you simply won't beat yourself, and that is Carroll's specialty.
The Mississippi State offense is really predicated on the running game. Anthony Dixon is the star tailback, and he's a good one. He's a big bruiser (240 pounds), and he's going to pick up consistent amounts of yardage. Though he's not much of a threat on the long run, he's still an effective runner, particularly between the tackles. And that's what Mississippi State will try to do, establish the run with Dixon and then work in play-action in the passing game with Carroll.
Alabama should be in pretty good shape with the MSU attack. With all due respect to Dixon, LSU's Jacob Hester is the most physical runner in the conference, and the Tide did a good job of shutting him down last week. The defensive line has been playing better as of late, and our linebacking corps is very big (averaging over 240 pounds per man), and that will help a lot in stopping a physical rushing attack. Wesley Carroll has done well at not turning the football over, but Alabama will bring possibly the best pass defense he's seen to date, and we're likely to confuse him a bit with some complex looks stemming from our 3-4 scheme.
All in all, it looks like we should be able to have a pretty good day against the Mississippi State offense.
Putting It All Together
The key to this game is likely to be the turnover battle. If you look at how Mississippi State beat Kentucky and Auburn, it was by creating a ton of turnovers (eleven, to be precise), and using those turnovers to generate a few points and limit the opposing offense. If we can limit the turnovers and force the MSU offense to march all the way down the field to score points, we should be in good shape. Neither Auburn or Kentucky could do that, and we all saw the end result in both cases.
All in all, if we win the turnover battle we are likely to win this game. We have more talent than the Dawgs do, plus more depth and better coaching. But the Bulldogs defense has at times done a great job of getting turnovers, and the MSU offense isn't likely to turn it over. Using that formula, they could get a few big turnovers against us, give their offense some easy points, limit us offensively, and then pound away with Dixon and company and be in good shape to get the win.
And honestly, that's a major concern. Protecting the football is easier said than done. Again, Wilson could probably qualify to be the poster child for costly turnovers, and it's likely that Titus Brown will give us some major problems in the passing game.
This is a game that, on paper, we should win. Again, more talent, more depth, and better coaching. You do the math. We should be able to move the ball relatively well, score some points, and give the MSU offense lots of trouble. But our opponent this week is an opportunistic one, and they have feasted upon foes who beat themselves.
If we can protect the football and not beat ourselves, the Tide should win with relative ease. If we cannot do that, however, there is a very good chance that we could suffer our second embarrassing loss in a row to the Dawgs. Rest assured, these guys will come ready to play and lay it all on the line, we'll just have to see if we have the discipline and mental fortitude to put the LSU game behind us and play good, solid football.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The last sentence summed it up
Titus Brown
by Picture Me Rollin on Nov 9, 2007 11:04 AM CST reply actions
Correct
You are correct though, he was not recruited at all by the top programs. A lot of people expected him to be an outside linebacker, not a defensive end.
Manson turned out to be a bust at Florida. After toiling down the depth chart at tailback, he's now playing DB, and apparently not doing too well there either.
Speaking of Davis, he may have to give up football soon due to the shoulder injury. Apparently he just tried to come back and then re-injured it. Saban said something about it, and it seems likely.
by outsidethesidelines on Nov 9, 2007 12:25 PM CST up reply actions
Croom does love Alabama...
by UofAin83 on Nov 9, 2007 11:36 AM CST reply actions
The UK game.
MSU is perfectly capable of long scoring drives on Bama.
And another thing, of all the big boys in the conference Alabama is the school State fans fear the least. Go back and look at the record book from the time Sherrill arrived. Bama rarely if ever blows State out, and more often then not struggles to win. After losing 15 straight games to Bama following the 80 upset, Bama is only 6-5 against us.
Come again?
Just looking at the data, you guys have played five SEC games to date, and have only had five touchdown drives of longer than 48 yards. Hell, 'Bama had four of 70 yards or longer in the Tennessee game alone. Perhaps you mean long scoring drives in that you drive a long way and have to settle for a field goal, but I really don't see where you would or should be bragging about that. And you may have racked up a lot of long TD drives against the likes of Tulane, but it hasn't happened against the quality competition you find in conference play. You don't get brownie points for beating up on the Sisters of the Poor.
The truth is that State generally has no long threat. Through five conference games, you guys have only had one passing play go for longer than 30 yards, and that was in the season opener. The same thing goes for the running game. In conference play, Dixon has had only two runs of more than 20 yards, and Ducre has only had one.
At bottom it's just an offense that has to nickel and dime itself down the field, and that's a tough thing to do. Just look at the Kentucky game you were speaking of, the two long scoring drives took 30 plays. And when you have to do that in order to move the field, well, you only average one touchdown drive of longer than 48 yards per week.
And so what that you guys lead the SEC in time of possession? Much research has indicated that the TOP statistic is wholly meaningless. You should look up who led the SEC in TOP last year, and see how they fared, particularly when they played MSU.
As for the overall series, I believe you're cherry-picking the data a bit. In the last 11 games you guys are 6-5 against us, but that is due to three straight wins during Jackie's heyday from 1996-1998. In the last eight meetings, 'Bama is 6-2. And moreover, prior to the 1996 win, you guys had only beaten us one time since 1957. You guys have always had major problems against us, and for the most part have only managed to beat our really bad teams (1957, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2006, etc.). Since the bombing of Pearl Harbor, you guys have only beaten an Alabama team with a winning record twice.
And so what the games are usually not blowouts? No they aren't usually outright blowouts, but they usually aren't that close, either. Again, we've won six of the last eight, and those six wins came by an average of over 17 points. Even when you factor out the 38-0 shellacking in 2003, we've still averaged to win by over 13 points per game. True, that's not a blowout margin, but so what?
Personally, I'll take a 13-17 point win this Saturday any time. I know I certainly wouldn't be bemoaning the fact that we didn't blow you guys out if we win 30-13. Rest assured, I'll be quite happy.
by outsidethesidelines on Nov 9, 2007 1:47 PM CST up reply actions
BURN!!!!
by BamaReturns07 on Nov 9, 2007 3:20 PM CST up reply actions
Interesting..
Alabama will probably be a very good team, very soon. But I'm puzzled as to what makes Bama fans think that is this year? You have no wins over any currently ranked teams (State does have 2). Sure, you've come close, but if that counted then State would have been great last year. For this year, accept that (like State) you're middle-of-the-pack in the SEC, and start preparing to be back in a national title hunt within 2 years.
I have no idea who will win Saturday, but at State -4.5 I would be very tempted to take the Dogs and the spread.
by bulldogbaja on Nov 9, 2007 3:29 PM CST reply actions
Gimme a break
So you think Wesley Carroll has done well or hasnt done much. Which one? Lets see...
Carroll is 54.7% 4td 0int 6sacks and rat of 107.42
Wilson is 55.2% 14td 6int 21sacks and rat of 117.53
Sure Carroll doesnt have Wilson beat in the long yards or tds but there are a couple of his stas that stand out.He seems to be awful close to your golden boy and it seems Wilson even has a few years on our third string Freshman.
I think your analysis of Croom is fasinating. You must talk to him on a regular basis. I had no idea he bleeds crimson and white. That is exactly like me saying Saban bleeds the blue and gold of Kent State but he will never admit it.
Just shut up and watch the game and may the best team win. Hopefully you wont beat yourselves because surely State doesnt have a good enough team to do it on their own.
by asusual on Nov 9, 2007 10:06 PM CST reply actions
Asshole!
OTS was not saying Croom bleeds Crimson and White; he was stating that, as an Alabama graduate and former assistant coach, he will always have ties to the university.
Go ring a cowbell, cause this ain't Shula's team big boy!
by BamaReturns07 on Nov 10, 2007 7:56 AM CST up reply actions
Once again...........
Alabama is still Croom's alma mater, and despite all he may say about maroon, the man bleeds crimson and white and wanted the Alabama job desperately"
What part of that doesnt say Croom bleeds crimson and white???? U of A teach you how to read?
Wait, let me guess you didnt even think about going to college but you still pull for the tide?
Go back to your trailer and enjoy the game.
by asusual on Nov 10, 2007 9:52 AM CST reply actions
Seriously, what the hell is your problem?
You see, asusual, your envy of the Alabama program and it's rich history is very evident in your posts. Try as you may to bring irrelevant stats and twist recent history to make your delusional point, the facts are simple: Bama is better than MSU, and Bama will always be better than MSU. We have more tradition (other than cowbells), more championships, and we will contend, in a couple of short years, for more championships. Hell, we were one score away from playing in the SEC championship game THIS year; MSU is mediocre, and will always toil in mediocrity. Sure, you may, one day, have a 9 or 10 win season, but those days will be few and far between. Enjoy beating Shula last year, because you are just another stepping stone on our way back to the top.
Finally, I am more educated and hold more degrees than you could ever imagine. But thanks for the response!
by BamaReturns07 on Nov 10, 2007 10:51 AM CST up reply actions
Honestly?
Also, just because you can write a full paragraph and then you have to state how smart you are says it all.
As long as bama has fans like you we dont need a win on the field to know who is better.
by asusual on Nov 10, 2007 11:23 AM CST reply actions
Hey Everybody!
A quick review of the rules:
- Fans from other teams are welcome as long as they don't troll or flame
- No name calling
This is not your typical obnoxious message board and we don't want to see it turn into one.
Well?
1) Your obnoxious fan called me ***hole
2) Your precious bama team came up short(again)
Wilson does seem to be consistent on one thing. Getting sacked on the last play of the game.
I couldnt help but notice ousidethesidelines left off the fact that bama hasnt scored a touchdown against the dogs since 2004. Well, you cant win if you cant score.
GO DOGS!!!!!!!!!!!!
by asusual on Nov 10, 2007 3:08 PM CST reply actions
Obnoxious fan?
by BamaReturns07 on Nov 10, 2007 3:36 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks. But not a great game on our end
We are sorry that one of your "fans" has come on our boards to troll and flame. It is nice to see someone with class drop by to chat.
by BamaReturns07 on Nov 10, 2007 3:35 PM CST up reply actions

by 

















