Touch Me, I'm Going to Scream...
...if you don't.
I know there's really no way we are ever going to know the rhyme and reason of the three (and sometimes more) back system we are currently using, but considering the fumble troubles of Glen Coffee, our primary back so far, and the continuing emergence of Mark Ingram, I thought it would be a good idea to start keeping track of who's getting the touches in each game. Unfortunately, Alabama doesn't keep (or at least doesn't publish) a "snaps" count, so unless one of you scamps wants to become an RBR intern and start recording the games and writing down who is in on each play and e-mailing it to us from here out, I'll just keep track of the number of carries and the percentage of overall rushes each one has from here on out. This is basically an attempt to see who is getting the most time and who the staff trusts most in the games (which is why the snaps count would really come in handy. I'm just saying...), and really to see if and how things shift over the course of the season. The three primary backs are Coffee, Mark Ingram, and Roy Upchurch, obviously, and I'll also be keeping a column for "other" that will include Wilson's scrambles and any rushes by backs getting some time late in the game when things are pretty comfortable (or, in at least one case so far, receiver runs).
From the numbers alone, Coffee is still the leader so far as carries go, and was only equalled or eclipsed in the blowout wins...at least until Ole Miss. Going through the play by play, Coffee and Ingram were actually dead even as far as carries go in the first half, each rushing three times a piece in the 1st quarter and six times each in the 2nd quarter, and Coffee had three rushes to Ingram's one in the third quarter. It's in the fourth quarter where things get interesting, as Coffee's only carry resulted in a lost fumble and Ingram carrying the load the rest of the way (he got seven more carries before the game was over). In Coffee's defense, he was hit in the backfield very quickly and didn't really have time to secure the ball after the hand off, but given his history (fumbliitis against Ole Miss last season saw his carries drop, and in the previous two games he had potentially devestating fumbles) it looks like the staff chose to go with the more sure handed Ingram while trying to keep the clock rolling in the waning moments of the game. Could this mean a shift towards Ingram becoming the primary back? Maybe so, and over the next few weeks we'll be able to follow how (and if) things change.
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
Saban says
Coffee’s fumble was not his fault. But I think due ot fumbles we will see less of Coffee against UT. However, although I like Ingram, he is a bit of “dancer” trying to dance his way through the line, while Coffee is a “plower” as he just plows ahead. I’m afraid we need Coffee (or Upchurch who runs much like Coffee) but think it will be Ingram.
I also would like to see us develop some different types of runs such as flanker reverse type plays or designed QB draws. I think our running game was exposed by Ole Miss who was not a good defensive team (they are good offense wise). I think UT, LSU, MSU, and AU will all have better D’s than Ole Miss (maybe not as good O’s.) We better mix something up somewhere.
by 5026 on
Oct 20, 2008 8:27 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
We saw a lot of....
…Ingram trying to cut to the outside against UK, something you see a lot from true freshmen (trying to use speed to break outside instead of following blocks inside), but I didn’t see it against Ole Miss. I’d like to see us run the zone read some more, I know we did it a few times earlier in the season and it worked out pretty well, but it’s disappeared since then. Wilson is decently mobile and pretty tough, so I’d like to see that taken advantage of more.
by Todd on
Oct 20, 2008 8:45 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
success rate
Have you guys looked any more at the running success rate? I found it very interesting last year when you started to compare Grant vs. others, which I feel seemed to predict his lack of touches this year. It also highlighted the two world-class back Arkansas had last year.
by DJackson on
Oct 21, 2008 10:12 AM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Question
Could Coffee be fumbling more than anyone else because of the sheer VOLUME combined with his particular running style (“plower” into BODIES, rather than dancing around?) It would seem that, with this combination, fumbles would be expected—at least on paper.
Not making excuses here, just offering a possible explaination? Maybe it isn’t the running style we would want durning a very close game, for sure, but it is hard to say I don’t want him to have as many touches! He comes out of a run that looks like it fails to gain anything, with 3 or 4 yards every time. I hate to see that on the bench AND I hate to see the ball on the ground…..glad it isn’t my decision.
by crimsongirl on
Oct 21, 2008 2:43 PM CDT
reply
actions
0 recs
There have been...
…plenty of big backs who plow into the opposition and know how to hang on to the ball. Last week’s fumble seemed to lie on several people’s shoulders, but Coffee does have a little history of dropping the rock. That said, I would love to see him out there on the first play of every game…not dropping the ball.
by NiceLittleSaturday on
Oct 21, 2008 3:28 PM CDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs













