So i am looking on rivals and scout and i am noticing that we are ranked 5 and 4 respectively on the two... then i started disecting further and noticed that we have a ton of three star guys, which doesnt really bother me, but i go further to notice that most of these three star guys are O-lineman. so this is the question i have... would i be right in assuming that many of the O-lineman would be considered not high talent because it is a position that is really coached up? like, i mean, that they get recruited by CNS and co. with full intentions that they will get alot better?
Then with that assumption, we may end up not having the top class this year, but we got all the "fancy position" players we need to make the class be ranked in the top five, while getting all the O-lineman and D-lineman that CNS and co. will coach up. So tho a few of the 3 star rankings may make the talent not look as good, they are getting the guys they want in there?
So basically, can anyone really expound on whether maybe O-lineman arent quite as "ready" for college ball as, say, a wide receiver or runningback, and that is why they have the three star ratings or is it just because they arent the best lineman out there??