A Tale of Two Offenses: vs Clemson and vs Tulane
0 recs |
11 comments
Comments
The big problem
Was that we didn’t try to run the ball nearly as much as we should have. Ingram only had two carries in the first half. The running stats are distorted by the sacks. Coffee ran for 6.1 yards a carry, Ingram 5.7 — but they combined for only 20 carries. The only times Upchurch touched the ball were on one reception and the punt block.
The first series really typified the whole game. Coffee carries the first play for six yards, followed by two incomplete passes.
And it should be noted that the time of possession is distorted by scoring twice on Tulane punts.
by Mac T on Sep 7, 2008 2:21 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
I really didn’t understand the play calling getting away from what was successful. And, on 3rd and long, knowing they’re bringing pressure from the edge, why aren’t we running a screen, a draw, or a quick slant … anything but a 5-step drop to set up John Parker as a sitting duck for a sack? That’s the same crap that Shula used to drive me crazy with.
Still, we were all careful not to get too high after the Clemson win, so let’s not let ourselves get too low after this poor performance by the offense. We all know that every season, even the best ones, have their ups and downs. So, we can still come back and play with fire and consistency in future games.
BamaFrazier
by BamaFrazier on Sep 8, 2008 6:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I see your point...
…but there’s no way of compensating for or explaining away 3 of 11 on 3rd down conversions.
by Nico2.0 on Sep 7, 2008 9:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well..
A lot of those were third and long, which goes back to lots of pass attempts on first and second down. Seriously, when was the last time a favored Alabama team only had 21 rush attempts (20 by Coffee and Ingram, one real rush attempt by Wilson)? This is in a game in which we led almost the entire way.
by Mac T on Sep 8, 2008 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
A bad idea by Mal, for what it's worth
When I received the email last week from MM, instructing us to be “so nice” to Tulane because they are hurricane victims, it just didn’t sit right. I thought it was “so nice” to give them free room and board for a week. A standing ovation when they ran onto the field? No rammer jammer if we win? Is this a competing team? Are we maybe supposed to let them win? Do we have to do this for LSU—they are hurricane victims, too. No, LSU is a real team. Not nice Tulane. Junk like that is incredibly motivating to the team being taken for granted. Let’s not spend our effort, being condescendingly magnanimous, and revving up the opponent, beyond it’s own capability to be self-motivated. Let’s get beyond world diplomacy and think of these things as what they are—football games against a competitor who would love nothing better than to skin our pompous you-know-whats. ENOUGH OF THAT!
marycontrary
by adeleswims on Sep 7, 2008 9:48 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Tulane
Is a good ball club, and that conference is very underrated. Look what Southern Miss gave Auburn, a game. Just like Tulane gave us. yes mal is a dumbass, i think we established that a few years ago, and his letter to be nice was just not a good idea. Add another to his list of “good ideas”. Where Mike Price is listed at number 1 by the way.
Letting a team know we are going to take it easy on them, how dumb? thats as dumb as wearing sweatpants to a college party! Not only does it psyche that team up, it takes the edge off of us. We came out flat, and played like we didnt give a shit what happened. Oh well, we are 2-0
Hell, no! A tie is like kissing your sister!
by comer4tide on Sep 8, 2008 9:51 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
They are pretty good
A buddy of mine that has the misfortune of being a LSU fan ntoed that last night, and said, ‘they played us real tough last year.’ And they did.
That being said, I’m back to working on saying ’we’re 2-0.’ My friends at the party (I was the only Bama fan) seemed puzzled that I wasn’t happy, but it was a bucket of Ole Miss and LSU people. The former would be happy with any win at all, and the latter is fine with sloppy wins.
Never quit. It is the easiest cop-out in the world.
by gorjus on Sep 8, 2008 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mal
I’d actually rank Mal’s biggest “dumbass” moves this way:
1. Dubose new contract after ’99
2. Mike Shula hire
3. Mike Price hire
At least Price was a legit coach so there’s grounds for a defense of that decision.
by Bens4vcobra on Sep 8, 2008 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
thats true
i think dumbass move was givin him the credit card to have fun with hooers down in Fl
Hell, no! A tie is like kissing your sister!
by comer4tide on Sep 8, 2008 11:20 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm no Mal fan...
…but why was the Mike Shula hire a ‘dumbass’ move? He was hired in May of 2003. Who was available? Croom? So two years ago we could have fired him instead? Now there’s a great PR move.
by NiceLittleSaturday on Sep 9, 2008 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















