Initial Impressions from the Kentucky Game

A few initial impressions after the Kentucky game:
- From the outset, looking at the entire picture, the Tide simply did not play very well against Kentucky. Of course you should never complain too much any time you can go on the road in conference play and get an 18-point victory, but by the same token you shouldn't be so blinded by the scoreboard to not realize that we played poorly and that, based purely on the performances of the two teams, that this game should have been a lot closer.
- Without doubt, Kentucky was their own worst enemy in this game. They had five personal foul penalties, a slew of dropped passes to open receivers, several incredibly bone-headed throws by Hartline (many of which resulted in interceptions), and that is not counting the last-second fumble to end the first half that resulted in a Courtney Upshaw touchdown. Truth be told, Kentucky beat themselves in this game more than anything else. The lopsided margin of victory was really the result of Alabama just allowing Kentucky to keep shooting themselves in the foot.
- Offensively, our strategy in the beginning of the game really made very little sense. Kentucky never even remotely stopped our running game, but we decided to stop it ourselves by airing the football out. And making matters even more head-scratching was that we kept throwing deep, instead of trying to establish the short and intermediate passing game. And that strategy was even more perplexing given how Nick Saban talked after the game about how the strong winds made throwing the football so difficult early. I really just never understood what we were trying to do offensively, nor did anyone else, and our offensive play-calling was perhaps the most suspect it has been since McElwain arrived.
- And speaking of the running game, I worried coming in that Kentucky would be able to shut us down, but our guys really answered the bell. Kentucky never really stopped us in the running game, and Mark Ingram and Roy Upchurch combined to run for 153 yards on only 24 carries. Trent Richardson's stat line doesn't look very good because he got the workhorse duty in the fourth quarter trying to run out the clock, but again in meaningful situations Kentucky never really stopped us. The problem was, really, that we stopped ourselves by simply choosing not to run the football.
- The offensive line did a very good job in pass protection. As I said in the preview, Kentucky could really get after the quarterback, and we largely neutralized them at the point of attack. McElroy was hit several times -- which is honestly a given for any team these days really wanting to throw the football a lot -- and he is clearly helping the offensive line out by not holding onto the ball too long, but even so our guys up front did a fine job. McElroy threw 26 passes yesterday, and was sacked only once. Moreover, thanks to McElroy's pocket presence, he limited that sack to only a two yard loss. Truth be told, protecting the passer is a joint effort between quarterback himself and the offensive line, but I do think it's clear at this point that McElroy and the newly revamped offensive line do a better job of it than John Parker Wilson and the group we had a year ago.
- Good news on injuries... there were none. I did see Barrett Jones gimpy at one point, but he never left the game and looked to be okay. Few things in football are more precious than staying healthy.
- The Wildcat... didn't see it a single time all day, to my knowledge. I think it's clear now that our offense uses it as a weapon -- and forces the opposing defense to prepare for it -- but for the most part we really do not see it as an integral part of our offense like many other teams do.
- Earl Alexander came up with a huge catch on the touchdown drive late in the second quarter, and the redshirt junior continues to make good things happen when he can actually get in the game. The problem is he's buried on the depth chart by Julio Jones and Mike McCoy, and he doesn't get very many balls thrown in his direction.
0 recs |
18 comments
|
Comments
Julio blasphemies.
I agree with you; I don’t know what to make of him either. I suspect he is facing a lot of double coverage (I say suspect because the camera angles don’t allow for much route watching) and is helping the team just by drawing the extra man, but he is dropping a lot of balls this year. I remember three against VT. Two of them, one for a TD and one on 3rd and long for a 1st down, were uncontested. Yesterday he dropped at least two that were gimmies and one that was decently defended but could have been his. I hope that his troubles lately are due to not being 100%, but he was iffy against VT too.
If it were up to me, I'd blitz on offense too.
by The Heffalump on Oct 4, 2009 4:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
on the other hand...
he’s been doing his part with blocks and such so it’s not a case of him slacking off.
by kleph on Oct 4, 2009 4:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want to see him do well
He is one of my fav’s all time. I just can’t understand why we don’t go his way more often, like UGA and Green.
by littlebrothersyndrome on Oct 4, 2009 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's a blocking monster...
no doubt about that. To justify his threat as a receiver, though, he needs to start catching some 50/50 balls. He’s not even catching gimmies. This is conceivably the biggest offensive threat we’ve had since Shaun Alexander, if he lives up to his potential. I think something is off. Obviously, I hope he works it out.
If it were up to me, I'd blitz on offense too.
by The Heffalump on Oct 4, 2009 10:15 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Year to Year
Last year UK caught us in a week when we didn’t play all that well at home and we won by 3. This year they caught us in a week when we didn’t play all that well on the road and we won by 18. There are definite concerns, starting and largely consisting of Hightower’s absencce, but if that’s how we fare at less than “A game” status, I’ll take it.
by Watchman on Oct 4, 2009 4:23 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The
struggles in this Kentucky game could be a blessing in disguise. Now this team will be hungry and motivated to prove they are better than we played against Kentucky. I expect this team to play very well against Ole Miss. I do however think Reamer is not gonna cut it at Inside linebacker. Yes he is a solid player but he gets knocked back too much by the runningbacks. We need someone bigger at that position. Some runs that would not gain any yards are gaining 2 or 3 yards now because Reamer gets knocked back. Linebacker was supposed to be our deepest position. Can Chris Jordan or Nico Johnson not play the position?
This upcoming season I'm gonna refer to Julio Jones as "The Magic Man" and Trent Richardson as "El Diablo"
by AlabamaTitans2009 on Oct 4, 2009 4:28 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
You can
bet that Ole Miss is gonna run outside toward Reamer almost every running play next week.
This upcoming season I'm gonna refer to Julio Jones as "The Magic Man" and Trent Richardson as "El Diablo"
by AlabamaTitans2009 on Oct 4, 2009 4:29 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, i also tend to think
part of the blah effort on saturday was a lot of the players were looking ahead to the contest in oxford.
by kleph on Oct 4, 2009 4:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Arenas deep ball
I don’t really think Arenas looked that bad on that deep throw. The receiver clearly pushed off to make the catch and it should have been offensive pass interference. Arenas should have turned around to see the ball, but he was right on top of the guy until he got pushed off.
by Espy714 on Oct 4, 2009 5:19 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Not sure I saw the push off....
it appeared he was in good position and just had the receiver make the play. However, I was drinking heavily so my spot on play by play analysis was blurry at best
Great Game Hokies! What a battle!
by The Voice of Reason on Oct 5, 2009 8:45 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He
did push off, it wasn’t blanant but it was a slight push to get separation. Although seeing as how Arenas never turned around, he may not have needed to.
"A demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots." -H. L. Mencken
by Bens4vcobra on Oct 5, 2009 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
blatant...
"A demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots." -H. L. Mencken
by Bens4vcobra on Oct 5, 2009 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Of our remaining games...
…who has an electric return game?
…who has a balanced offensive attack?
Does anybody meet both criteria? If so, yes…I’m worried.
by crimson37 on Oct 4, 2009 7:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Honestly...
(1) Given how shitty our kick coverage team is, everyone has an electric return game.
(2) Not too many balanced attacks… South Carolina, LSU, and Tennessee have struggled offensively this year. Auburn has the most balanced now by far.
"Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself." -- Milton Friedman
by outsidethesidelines on Oct 4, 2009 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Auburn... they look good.
We have had troubles against the spread in the past. With a multi-threat guy like Hightower out and Cody being mostly a 1st and 2nd down guy we might be vulnerable to an offense like theirs that likes to keep a defense from making subs. Replacing Hightower is a by committee deal and we wont get to put situational personnel in place. I think we beat them, but not easily.
If it were up to me, I'd blitz on offense too.
by The Heffalump on Oct 4, 2009 10:22 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Auburn
game definitely looks more scary than it did in August. They are thin but havn’t sustained any major injuries. Todd hasn’t lit up the stat sheet, but he’s been efficient and is making plays that he certainly wasn’t making last year, particularly on 3rd down. UT is a solid defensive team, and watching that game you had to wonder if Auburn would’ve had a chance had UT had any semblence of a functional passing game, but nevertheless they won.
"A demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots." -H. L. Mencken
by Bens4vcobra on Oct 5, 2009 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Moving to the defensive side of the ball, things weren’t so pretty. Kentucky has an offense that will almost certainly finish near the bottom of the SEC in most statistical categories, and they scored 20 points against us. Making matters worse, we never really stopped them, and they should have scored more.
The most interesting thing I noticed about Hightower’s absence was that we seemed to be taking fewer risks defensively. With Hightower and McClain in the game at the same time, we were taking a lot of risks with blitzes because we felt the linebacker corps could still get the job done even if they were undermanned simply because those two were in the game. Against Kentucky, though, we didn’t see that kind of risk-taking, and that may have been one of the reasons why we didn’t rush the passer as well.
These two points are certainly linked. Thinking back to the Florida International game, they moved the ball fairly well in the first half against us, and Saban later made the comment that we played man in the first, then mixed in zones and got more QB pressure in the second half where we really shut them down. Do you think maybe this was a case of having a vanilla game plan against a lackluster offense to avoid showing teams with better attacks what we might do with the new LB lineup? It obviously wasn’t working terribly well, but as we were never really threatened after halftime, there was never a need to change things.
Without doubt, the single biggest play of the game was the Rolando McClain strip and subsequent Courtney Upshaw fumble return for a touchdown. That single play absolutely changed the game, and it would have been a very different contest had it not occurred. If we don’t get that then we go to halftime leading 14-6 with Kentucky getting the ball to start the second half. After that play, victory was never in serious jeopardy.
Had Richardson not gotten out of the endzone at the start of our 97 yard drive, I’m afraid that may have been the play of the game. We were inches away from going down 8-7 and putting our kick coverage unit on the field, undoubtedly giving them great field position. And don’t forget that at that point of the game the defense had been out there a lot. I imagine we’d have still found a way to win, but it would doubtless have been much less comfortable.
At every point from 1997-2008, we would have been literally wetting ourselves with glee over such a victory, and now such a victory is met general criticism. The times have changed in Tuscaloosa, that much we know.
That was one of my thoughts after the game: it sure is nice to be complaining about wins again. But now, we’re complaining about wins where we actually cover the spread.
by zeke2029 on Oct 4, 2009 10:13 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















