A Closer Look At Red Zone Struggles
After scoring a mere two offensive touchdowns over the course of the past three weeks, it's safe to say that our once prolific offensive juggernaut has now effectively ground to a halt. One of the major complaints consistently aired has been our inability to convert in the red zone, so I wanted to take a closer look at that aspect of our performance. To that end, I've gone back through the play-by-play data for the past three weeks, focusing on the possessions in which we have gotten a 1st down and 10 inside our opponents 20-yard line to see what we could find.
Let's take a closer look. The following are all of the red zone possessions that we have had the past three weeks, broken down by game:
Ole Miss
- First and goal at the Ole Miss 3-yard line, immediately after driving 63 yards. We moved down the field thanks to two nice runs, one by Mark Ingram and another by Trent Richardson, and two nice catches by Colin Peek, and it looked like an easy score was coming. Nevertheless, we threw an incomplete pass on first down, and then had a false start penalty on second down. With 2nd and goal from the 8-yard line, we threw an incomplete pass to Julio Jones, and Colin Peek couldn't quite hang onto a tough catch on third down. Leigh Tiffin trots onto the field for a 25-yard goal attempt, which is good.
- First and ten at the Ole Miss 12-yard line, immediately after driving 54 yards. We get a decent gain with a run on first down, but an incomplete pass comes on second down, and Greg McElroy scrambles for a few yards on a pass play on third down. McElroy gets popped hard, but he hangs onto the ball and Leigh Tiffin hits a field goal
- First and goal at the Ole Miss 5-yard line after Corey Reamer's blocked punt. We run for no gain on first down, and then go to the pass, where two incompletions follow. 'Bama settles for a Leigh Tiffin field goal.
- First and goal at the Ole Miss 3-yard line after a long by Mark Ingram. Despite two good gains preceding this play from Ingram on the ground, we decide to line up in the pistol and it backfires immediately. We screw up the snap out of the pistol, losing three yards in the process. Back at the 6-yard line, we run for no gain and then fire an incomplete pass on third down. Another Leigh Tiffin field goal.
- First and ten at the Ole Miss 16-yard line, set up by Kareem Jackson's long interception return. Trent Richardson goes off right tackle for seven yards on first down, but he fumbles at the end and Ole Miss recovers.
South Carolina
- First and ten from the South Carolina 14-yard line after driving 66 yards. Ingram runs for six yards on first down, setting up a promising second and short, but two runs straight into the line net no real gain, and thus Leigh Tiffin comes on for the field goal.
- First and ten from the South Carolina 18-yard line immediately after Mark Ingram's 54-yard run. Needing a breather, Ingram comes out of the game, and Trent Richardson runs on first down for no gain. Incomplete passes to Upchurch and Julio follow, respectively, and Leigh Tiffin comes on for the field goal.
- First and goal from the South Carolina 4-yard line after Mark Ingram singlehandedly carried us down the field in the Wildcat. We bring McElroy back in for this one, who tosses it left to Ingram for the touchdown.
Tennessee
- First and ten at the Tennessee 12-yard line after driving 56 yards. This is the controversial play-calling episode right before halftime. Mark Ingram goes off left tackle for eight yards on first down, setting up a second and a short two inside the UT five. Unfortunately, we throw an incomplete pass on second down to Julio Jones, and it is followed up by yet another incomplete pass to Julio Jones on third down. Instead of going for the first down, Leigh Tiffin comes on for the field goal.
So, what do we see from all of this?
First and foremost, the passing game, yeah, um, what passing game? It goes without saying that throwing the football in the red zone is very difficult because the field becomes so compressed, but nevertheless, even with that in mind, it's a harsh reality... we literally haven't completed a pass in the red zone since the Kentucky game. In the last three games, McElroy is 0-10 passing in the red zone, and the "best" passing play we've had in that stretch is the short gain he had on the scramble where he was ultimately lit up against Ole Miss. What can you say? It's not rocket science... you can either move the ball by throwing it or running it, and if you are completely and totally unable to throw, well that really narrows your options then doesn't it?
Beyond that, playcalling does seem to have a lot of questions marks in it. We've had around five snaps the past three weeks from inside our opponent's three-yard line, and just about all of them have been passes? Why? I'm generally an advocate of spreading the field and throwing the football, but that's too much for even my taste. Besides, where has Cody been in goal line situations? We have not failed to convert a single time with him in the game the past two years, so why go away from it? And since we are struggling to throw the football so much in the red zone, why not just go to the Wildcat and take advantage of the additional blocker?
All of that said, however, the real key to look at here is just how few possessions we've had from within the red zone. Not counting easy setups by the defense and our special teams units, as an offense we've basically driven down field into the red zone only a grand total of six times over the course of three games. Do the math, that's effectively boiling down to the equivalent two lengthy drives per game. Two. That's all. So we've basically been unable to consistently move the football down the field, and making matters worse we cannot generate any explosive plays -- the longest pass play in the last three weeks is a mere 22 yards, and it's the only passing play we've had over this stretch of over 20 yards. So what do you do? You cannot move the football consistently down the field, and you cannot hit any big plays, so what do you do offensively? Simple, you don't score many points. That ring any bells?
In hindsight, then, the biggest issues that we have are probably not necessarily isolated in the red zone. Everything gets magnified once you get to the red zone, but as a general rule you're as good there as you are everywhere else on the field. Nothing magical happens once you get inside your opponent's 20-yard line. And with that in mind, it's not so much that we need to improve in the red zone offensively, it's that we need to improve offensively, period.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thoughts
Nothing magical happens once you get inside your opponent’s 20-yard line.
I’ve said a couple times lately that our red-zone “offense” reminded me of Club Shula: the surest way to not get a touchdown is to get inside the 20. I think it has everything to do with the compressed field and the play-calling. When you’re passing all the time on a short field, it’s not very hard to make sure everyone is covered. If you are going to pass in those situations, you have to be ready with plays that can take advantage of the field position and manipulate the defense instead of letting them use it to their own advantage.
Granted, the fact that we have no passing game whatsoever has something to do with our lack of passing game in the red zone, but I still think the fact that almost every red zone trip (especially when we get inside the 10) has involved 2 or more incomplete passes speaks volumes. There may not be something magical about the red zone, but there’s certainly something wrong with what we’re doing. It’s not just execution. It’s coaching. When 90,000 fans are screaming at you for calling ANOTHER pass play, ur doin it rawng.
Good analysis
I have thought all along the two biggest problems have been 1) playing calling 2) passing. One week we run it straight up the middle 3 times and the next we throw it twice from the 3 1/2. I do disagree a little about not moving the ball much to give ourselves a chance. Against both S.Carolina and TN defense struggled to get off the field. In one sense the offense didn’t have the ball enough but moved it somewhat when they had it. We need to hope for more aggressive playcalling and some players making plays. We need Julio to break out in this game.
Baptman
I agree about Cody.
He seems to be healthy now and he is not playing all that much on defense. I would sure like to try him inside the five until that gets stopped.
I would also like to see us run screen passes when we are on the 10. Just get the ball in a little space to Ingram, Upchurch, or Richardson and see if they can run it in for us.
Plus I was watching Oregon just run it all over USC running the little spread option thing on the goal line. If we had a QB who could run, like Star at QB and Ingram at RB, or even Ingram at QB with Trent at RB and then let them read the defense and either hand off or keep it. Now I’m not sure Star can run and I’m not sure how conservative you want to play it on the goal line, but if you pulled it out down there it would catch the D off guard.
I hate the NCAA more than UT & AU combined. At least with UT & AU you got a fighting chance.
I think what you just said...
would blow McElwain’s mind.
My vote goes to
Ingram in the wildcat running the ball with Cody blocking for him. Ain’t no way you don’t score with that package!
I bleed crimson and white...I puke Vol puke orange. RTR
We need to matriculate
that ball over the goal line. From the looks of these series, it seems like predictable playcalling is hurting us. Jimmy Mack needs to pull a few switch-a-roos on the defense, ejaculate that ball into the EZ.
MATRIX: Bennett, I thought you were--
BENNETT: Dead? You thought wrong. Ever since you had me thrown out of the unit, I've been waiting to pay you back. Do you know what today is, Matrix? Payday.
If they want to throw the ball
inside the 5 then they should do it smartly. Line Julio up outside with Cody and Ingram in the backfield and run play action. And they don’t even have to use Julio, the could just line up their TEs and run play action. Either way, inside the 5 with an oppurtunity for a 1st down and they decided to go with 2 passes to the end zone makes me wonder wtf was the OC thinking???? Wildcat was eating up UT: went away from it in the 2nd half of the game. I don’t get it.
On top of that, how many times have we seen McElroy go to Julio when Maze, Peek, or somebody else was wide open b/c the defense already knew he was going to Julio? SC game I seen it twice and Ole Miss 3 times. He’s got to make those reads. He drops back and looks for Julio only. I think part of that is due to everybody saying “get Julio the ball!!” I know Julio is a beast, but I’m sure he wouldn’t mind Mac hitting the open guy instead of throwing it to him with 3 defenders within arms reach at all times. Especially if that open receiver can score a TD.
He bleeds Garnet and Gold, She bleeds Crimson and White. AND THEY BOTH HATE ORANGE! GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!
If we run the Wildcat too much . . .
we won’t be able to recruit the Julios of the world. I know where you’re comin’ from, and I was screaming and cursing at the tv as loudly as any Bama fan when we threw twice with 2nd and 2 inside the 5, but it is a generally sound long-term strategy to build and run a multi-dimensional offense in which throwing a pass is possible on any given down and yardage. Theoretically, that is a key element in the success of the rushing game. If we line up in the Wildcat any more often than we already do, it will mean a shift in our long term strategy for the offense, which affects recruiting, player personnel, coaching the offensive line, etc. etc.
by M. Johnson Defender on Nov 3, 2009 4:45 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah, but how many times
have we seen teams lose b/c they went away from what was working?
I really think the OC needs to make better play calls and the QB coach needs to smack Mac upside his head. Maybe that’ll get him back on track. I don’t know. I just hope Bama’s offense can open it up against LSU’s defense and really put them on their hills. I think the bye week is going to fix a lot of issues, but we won’t know until game time.
BTW, a great coach is retiring from my beloved Noles: Mickey Andrews. He will be missed and will be known as one of colleges greatest DCs.
GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!
He bleeds Garnet and Gold, She bleeds Crimson and White. AND THEY BOTH HATE ORANGE! GO NOLES!! ROLL TIDE!!
by gonolesrolltide on Nov 3, 2009 4:52 PM CST up reply actions
Julio came to us after two lackluster years with JPW at QB.
We’ve never really been a pass first kind of team. I understand your point, but I think a lot more than simply what type of offense we run goes into landing top-notch recruits.

by 

















