2 cents on LSU
- LSU was juiced up and prepared for this game. Give them credit, I thought they were physical. In particular, I thought their OL acquitted themselves very well against our defensive front. I don't know the stats for TFLs or sacks, but I thought they did a decent job of pass protection against our base (not the blitz) and ran the ball ok, not great. I had really expected a little more push from our front.
- That said, if LSU was physical, we were Old Testament wrath of God. How many of their first-born sons did we strike down? Rich Brooks has all but said we were the most physical team they played (we're the "hardest to recover from"). Miles can never say that, given all the context in this rivalry, but I guarantee those ice baths are getting a workout in Baton Rouge.
- Along those lines, I'm not sure if Jordan Jefferson quit or not. He sure had the look of a player that said "no mas."
- Patrick Peterson is a great player. I would've loved to see him wearing crimson. He played well and made some great breaks on balls thrown to Julio. But here are some facts: (1) in 2008 Julio beat him one on one to set up the winning TD. (2) in 2009 Julio beat out his replacement for a screaming 73 yard go-ahead TD because PP couldn't go. Would Peterson have made the tackle? Who knows? He wasn't in the game. My image of Peterson is not kicking up divots on the INT, it's clawing his way off the field from cramps.
- Bo Bounds on talk radio in Jackson MS is advancing this argument: the missed call on the INT (and, to be fair, it was probably a missed call) "denied" LSU the "opportunity" to try to win the game, down 6. His point is that a TO is a momentum-changer and despite Bama's utter dominance of the 4th quarter (i.e., "winning time"), we'll never know what could've happened. Fair enough, but Bo, spare me the hypocrisy when somebody says Boise ought to play Cincinnati in the championship game. We'll never know, because those teams will be denied the opportunity. I'm not suggesting that officiating shouldn't be fair, and I'm not giving any credence to the conspiracy theorists, just pointing out some parallels. Football's about (among other things) meeting and overcoming adversity. Alabama did. LSU didn't.
- I'll also say this. The INT problem was a replay issue, not an "on-the-field" officiating problem. It was bang-bang on the field, and you can see on the replay that neither ref had a view of Peterson's feet. I think the right call when in doubt -- when you don't see it -- is an incomplete pass. There need to be consistent guidelines and technology for replay, but I don't blame this one on the guys on the field.
- LSU's punting was magnificent, but I actually thought P.J. did a pretty nice job. I can specifically recall 2 inside the 10 and another inside the 20, and there may have been more. Arenas was relatively limited on PR, in part due to their guy's leg.
- Tiffin's 40 yarder to push the lead to 9 came at a critical time in the game. It was clutch, and it was perfect. I think it's time to let go of Arkansas 2006. No one has ever scored more points for the Tide. Ever. Also loved that we got a touchback on the ensuing kick. He was feeling it at that point.
- Happy for G-Mac. He left some points on the field, but ended up with a pretty nice stat line and came back from his mistakes (vs. for example, a Jevan Snead meltdown). He's under a lot of scrutiny, and I think all in all began to recover some of his early season form in terms of spreading the ball around.
- I'm not sure I'd say Ingram should win the Heisman trophy, but frankly, he's our Tebow, in terms of being able to put the team on his shoulders and take us down the field. He's deserving of all the accolades he's given.
- Embarrassing admission: I enjoyed the ESPN.com "Drubner" road trip videos with Tank Conerly, et al. My 8 year old daughter and I watched them again last night.
- Last year, if you'll recall, we were still suffering through "0 for November" streaks to LSU, MSU, and Auburn. It's becoming my favorite month again. Not to put carts before horses, but I'm thrilled that we get another shot at Tebow-led Florida.
Roll Tide.
FanPosts are just that; posts created by the fans. They are in no way indicative of the opinions of SBN and the authors of Roll Bama Roll.
1 recs |
4 comments
| Add comment
Comments
I agree with you on Patrick Peterson.
He couldn’t endure hense he was an ineffective part of the gameplan for LSU. Tiffin, man oh man. Aside from Arky 2006 and Kentucky, and LSU 2008…..even though we won those games in 08 but with more fingernails in my stomach than needed. Tiffin has redeemed himself and is a weapon for this years Bama team PERIOD. As for the INT call. What I saw was this…it looked like an INT yet there was one closeup where you couldn’t tell if Peterson’s foot was totally in or out. If you asked me to bet my house and meek riches on whether or not he was in or out, I wouldn’t take the bet. Bama had a bad call on Gmac’s first pass. The pass to Williams the TE was a catch. Just so happened the replay booth took a “power hit” at the exact moment it was needed….right. The call on the field had to stand. I don’t see Ingram winning the Heisman unless he has another 200 yard game. He might just do it against MSU though. I too am looking forward to November and bring on them Gaytors. Overall nice post !
Your temper brings dishonor to my happy mooshu palace.
by mulletover on Nov 9, 2009 3:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Good post,
although it was Smelley that made the catch. So if the lswho’s want to play the hypothetical…let’s do. When/if peterson made the interception lswho was not moving the ball against us…averaging less than a yard per play. So for the whos to say it cost them the game assumes that they would go and score the touchdown to go ahead. Well when GMAC’s first pass to Smelley shoulda/woulda been complete we would have been averaging 15 to 17 yards per play, so i will go ahead and assume that we would have scored. Secondly the punt that pinned BAMA inside the 1 yard line. It certainly looked as though it was touched by an lswho player…i know the ball bounces kinda funny when on the ground, but it usually doesn’t go from moving toward the 5 yard line then all of a sudden moving toward the goal line while in the air. So lets assume…BAMA gets the ball on the 3 or 4 yard line, our play calling changes at that point and i would suggest that we give the ball to Ingram on multiple occasions which at that point in the 3rd quarter alone was averaging 10 to 11 yards a carry, then we don’t get hit with a safety or the short punt/kick off and we take 8 points off the lswho score…that’s a 15 point swing. So i assume we would/should have won 31 – 7.
I know i am being a little sarcastic here, as we all know what happens when you assume.
The point is this…lswho fans SHUT UP the better team won you lost…get over it!
ROLL TIDE ROLL!!!!!
by alanbama12 on Nov 10, 2009 6:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good post.
"High standards come from passion within...." --Coach Nick Saban
by NiceLittleSaturday on Nov 9, 2009 3:43 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I was proud of the way Gmac played. If you’re going to knock him for missing a few open receivers, give him credit for throwing a perfect pass on the Hanks TD and also not handing the game away with turnovers (thanks to a little help from the refs :P ).
What you're seeing is team spirit. It's like the Holy Spirit, but more powerful.
-Hank Hill
by Zoltar on Nov 9, 2009 10:15 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















