Such a Tease: The History of the 3-4 Defense and Another Preview Shot
In writing the 3-4 defense primer for this year's edition for Yea Alabama, I was forced to cut a lot of the "history" aspects due to space limitations (and the fact that OTS's O-Line article went twice as long as oringally planned, with sexy awesome results), but a lot of it was fairly interesting stuff that I enjoyed researching and I'm sure a lot of you would be interested in. But, being the doofus that I am, I didn't bother saving the unused text after the article was submitted so....yeah. Thankfully, NFL Gridiron Gab has a great rundown on it's history and some interesting notes on our own beloved Nicktator and his development into one of the top coaches in the country under Bill Belichick.
When Belichick arrived (in Cleveland after a successful stint as DC of the New York Giants, a 3-4 team), he began dismantling not just the team but, in many respects, also the entire Browns organization so as to be able to rebuild it. From changing the way the Browns practiced, traveled and even ate, there was nothing he didn’t put his hands on.
Sound familiar? Not only did Saban learn about defense from one of the best defensive minds in the NFL, it would appear that the groundwork for The Process was laid in Cleveland as well. Further:
"Bill found a defensive coordinator he really liked in Nick Saban," said current Virginia HC Al Groh who was an assistant on Belichick’s Browns staff. "Even though the defense was the part of the team that Bill felt the most passionate about, he felt comfortable in putting Nick in charge of it. And Nick’s expertise was in the 4-3 — that was consistent with his background, that’s what he was familiar with — so that’s the defense he put in."
Two things to note here: First, Belichick was comfortable enough with Saban's abilities that he turned over the part of the team that got him the HC job in Cleveland to begin with, despite the fact that Saban ran a different defense than the one that had taken the Giants to two Super Bowl titles in five years with Belichick (and Lawrence Taylor) wreaking havoc on NFL offenses. Second, Saban continued to use the 4-3 scheme he was more familiar with from the time he took over as DC for the Browns up until his move to the Miami Dolphins. If you'll remember, Saban's defenses at LSU were 4-3 based defenses (you can actually download one of his LSU playbooks here, and every base diagram calls for four down linemen), and even during his time at Miami he was essentially running a 4-3 defense though most of his time with the Dolphins. I would happily wager that Jason Taylor, a prototypical "Jack" linebacker if there ever was one, had more to do with his move to a 3-4 scheme than anything. Taylor, who played weakside linebacker for Akron before moving to defensive end his senior year, was a versatile enough athlete to play with his hand down and standing up and gave Saban the ability to completely disguise his defensive front, something the 3-4 is tailor made for (and a topic I get into in Yea Alabama). Anyway, it's a great read and it ties in nicely with this Yea Alabama tease, so go check it out, right after you pre-order your copy of Yea Alabama '09 (remember, you need 42 copies). As for the tease:
...ooooooooo, pretty diagram...
ed.- Since I wasn't able to show a lot of the text that goes along with the diagram above, several astute commentators over at the tidesports forums have noted that the gap on the weakside is open, leaving the defense prone to a counter. The diagram is meant to illustrate the responsibilities of the Mike and Will in run support, i.e. filling any open gaps left by the down linemen. In this diagram, which is a straight power run to the strong (TE) side, the ball is already snapped and the defense has ostensibly read the play and is flowing towards the ball, meaning the Mike fills the open gap on the play side while the Will is left to "scrape" the play. Should they read counter to the weakside, the Will steps up to fill the open gap while the Mike trails or, conversely, if the back sees a cutback in the open A gap on the weakside, either the Will cuts back with him or one of the safeties comes up to make the tackle. Just to clear up any confusion...
0 recs |
16 comments
|
Comments
and if this has gotten you interested
we urge you to pop over to Smart Football where you’ll find a repost of the excellent analysis of Saban’s defense initially done last year in anticipation of the Clemson game.
by kleph on Jul 1, 2009 8:09 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
thank you thank you thank you
welcome to the SEC kiffykins...
by tempebamafan on Jul 1, 2009 8:49 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I think the 3-4
really evolved from the 5-2, since the Jack and Sam backers are positioned on the line of scrimmage in the old days. Now a five man front uses five down linemen, but in the old days people would play a 52 with three down and two up, stacked toward the tight end.
Another name to consider is Dick Lebeau. Saban and Belichick will both give him a lot of credit for his innovations.
From NFL Films circa 2000-and-something: “If you think the Bengals will continue their losing ways, then you don’t know Dick…Lebeau!”
MATRIX: Bennett, I thought you were--
BENNETT: Dead? You thought wrong. Ever since you had me thrown out of the unit, I've been waiting to pay you back. Do you know what today is, Matrix? Payday.
by Bamagrad on Jul 1, 2009 10:00 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
when i hear 3-4 usually the first thing that comes into my head is the old stand up blitzing outside backers in the late 80s early 90s NFL, Lawrence Taylor and Carl Banks, Pat Swilling and Rickey Jackson, it really was more of a 5-2, since they blitzed so damn much they seemed like defensive ends. but i was young then, so the nuances of strategy were lost on me.
Also, i wonder where the old 46 defense fits into this, the 46 has a Jack linebacker too.
by Alabama ManDance on Jul 1, 2009 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did anyone else
have bad thoughts while reading that Smart Football write up…
by bammer on Jul 1, 2009 10:26 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
keep in mind...
that was penned in anticipation of last year’s effort. and jccw ably notes that the forces of evil are mining it for any possible edge against us this year.
What interests me most is is the apparent success Saban’s “Cover 1 ‘Robber’” should theoretically have against the spread—what went so wrong, then, against Utah? And can Auburn reproduce that somehow? The Utes’ no-huddle approach is probably a good start (says Terrence Cody), but what else went right for the underdog down in New Orleans?
by kleph on Jul 1, 2009 10:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I heard...
…that the coaches and players were all drunk, so the NCAA is going to make us vacate the loss.
by NiceLittleSaturday on Jul 1, 2009 10:39 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Utah
was very smart on how they attacked us. No one had just abandoned the run from the start like the Utes did. I was very impressed at their gameplan. That said, Im not sure there is a SEC team that is set up like the Utes. Perhaps thats what Arky will look like in the future but no team is that undersized and that fast. Even as much as UF is a spread team, they still run the ball…a lot. Also, they completely did a 180 on what they do..Utah (correct me if im wrong) was really a running team…From all the pre game breakdowns that i read, every expected them to try to run the ball…The fact that we righted the ship and made it into a game leaves me with some hope..
We all know why we lost that game…our o-line was in shambles and we thought we’d run right over them. When it was apparent we couldn’t do that, well…you know the rest.
Looking back, im glad it happened. Sure it sucked to be once again the butt of everyones joke. But it showed that we haven’t arrived and that we still needed a lot of work. It left the returning players with a bad taste and a lot to prove. If we had won that game easily, do you think our players would have as much motivation as they do right now? No, at least now they will be focused and will be ready to prove that we are indeed back!
by bammer on Jul 1, 2009 11:12 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bammer said . . .
Looking back, im glad it happened. Sure it sucked to be once again the butt of everyones joke. But it showed that we haven’t arrived and that we still needed a lot of work. It left the returning players with a bad taste and a lot to prove. If we had won that game easily, do you think our players would have as much motivation as they do right now? No, at least now they will be focused and will be ready to prove that we are indeed back!
I think so, and I think you have a coach with the right mindset to do exactly that. He’s going “I told you dumb bunnies” all during practice till they hate everyone and everything and are deranged on the field, you watch. They’ll have something to prove this year. I’m looking forward to watching it!
Now entertain conjecture of a time
When creeping murmur and the poring dark
Fills the wide vessel of the universe.
From camp to camp through the foul womb of night
The hum of either army stilly sounds,
That the fixed sentinels almost receive
The secret whispers of each other’s watch:
Fire answers fire, and through their paly flames
Each battle sees the other’s umber’d face;
Steed threatens steed, in high and boastful neighs
Piercing the night’s dull ear, and from the tents
The armourers, accomplishing the knights,
With busy hammers closing rivets up,
Give dreadful note of preparation:
The country cocks do crow, the clocks do toll,
“Will it never be morning . . .”
by MeanBobMean on Jul 1, 2009 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
He also said...
Sure it sucked to be once again the butt of everyones joke.
Well, I’m not sure we’re quite the butt of the joke like we were in say, 2007…or 2006…or 2004…or 2003…or 2001…or….
by NiceLittleSaturday on Jul 1, 2009 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
UM
we were for at least the following days after the loss…
by bammer on Jul 1, 2009 3:51 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Losing to Utah
was not as embarrasing as some of the losses like ULM and MSU. Utah has a very good coach and they had some very good skill players, a lot to prove, and a game plan that could explot Bama.
We felt we had nothing to prove and were down due to the UF loss and Andre. Our guys, especially after Auburn, thought they could be #1 and then it was gone. I know they wanted to win, but maybe we were only 90% into the game. 90% will beat teams like Tulane, but against Utah we needed 100% and it clearly was missing.
I agree with Bammer. In the long run this defeat could propel us to a great 09 season. No real reason we can not be better in 09. We have the players, we have the coaches, and thanks to the Utes we have some extra motivation to improve.
I hate the NCAA more than UT & AU combined. At least with UT & AU you got a fighting chance.
by 5026 on Jul 1, 2009 4:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good stuff
I had no idea Saban ran the 4-3 at LSU and the Dolphins. Interesting…
"A demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots." -H. L. Mencken
by Bens4vcobra on Jul 1, 2009 5:00 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
When Saban
finds a dominant game-changing Jack linebacker look out because that is when his defense will shine and cause a lot of turnovers.
This upcoming season I'm gonna refer to Julio Jones as "The Magic Man" and Trent Richardson as "El Diablo"
by AlabamaTitans2009 on Jul 1, 2009 5:20 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd worry more . . .
About their cornerbacks. The linebackers will disrupt any offense they play more if you have quality corners who allow the backers to stay in that box. I’d take a top tier corner and a decent linebacker over the opposite in virtually any defensive scheme. Alabama’s linebackers last year were studs, this years’ will be as well, how will this year’s corners be?
by MeanBobMean on Jul 2, 2009 7:23 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
The inside
linebackers were studs in Rolando and Hightower but the two outside linebackers Fanney and Reamer are just solid players but nothing special. Reamer plays the Jack position I believe and that is why we have heard talk of moving Hightower to the Jack position because we need a good pass rusher at that position. The starting corners will be Kareem Jackson and Javier Arenas. We didn’t have a pass rush last year so thats why the cornerbacks looked like they weren’t any good because if a team has all day to throw eventually the reciever will get open so when we find a pass rush it will then make the secondary better also.
This upcoming season I'm gonna refer to Julio Jones as "The Magic Man" and Trent Richardson as "El Diablo"
by AlabamaTitans2009 on Jul 2, 2009 12:49 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 























