Box Score and Such: The Season So Far
I'm going to take a different approach this week while looking at the UNT box score. Since it was our best performance to date, we'll compare all three games to see what sort of improvements have been made over the first three weeks. First up, on offense:
| Gained | vs Virginia Tech | vs Florida Int. | vs North Texas |
| 1st Downs | 22 | 26 | 28 |
| 3rd Down | 6-17 (35%) | 3-10 (30%) | 10-14 (72%) |
| 4th Down | 0-0 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Total Yards | 498 | 516 | 523 |
| Passing | 230 | 241 | 263 |
| Comp-Att | 15-30 (50%) | 18-24 (75%) | 22-28 (79%) |
| Yards per pass | 7.7 | 10.0 | 9.4 |
| Rushing | 268 | 275 | 260 |
| Attempts | 49 | 42 | 45 |
| Yards per rush | 5.5 | 6.5 | 5.8 |
| Penalties | 10-83 | 7-65 | 2-15 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Fumbles | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| INTs | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| TOP | 37:02 | 31:38 | 30:43 |
Notice the steady improvement in the following categories:
1. First Downs: The offense is gaining more first downs each consecutive game, including against UNT where we were playing Star Jackson (and essentially the rest of the backups as the 2nd half went on) for effectively half of the game.
2. Third Down Conversions: A severe sore spot in the first two weeks, our third down conversion rate jumped up to 75% against UNT (again, playing mostly 2nd stringers throughout the second half). We can argue that UNT's defense aided in that greatly, but we weren't shooting ourselves in the foot with penalties and digging into 3rd and long situations in this game either.
3. About Those Penalties: OTS's penalty breakdown post should be a short one this week after commiting only 2 for 15 yards. That's pretty well back to '08 standards and a welcome sight (again, especially since we were playing a lot of young backups).
4. Total Yardage: Total yardage has increased in each game so far, as well as total passing yardage. The decline in the relative defensive prowess of our opponents certainly helps, but you can still argue "as defenses get worse, our offense should perform better." I'd be concerned if we weren't improving, and, again, we were still driving the field with relative ease with the second string in.
5. Time of Possession: The only stat that has dropped each game so far. Not sure what to make of this one, honestly. On the one hand it could be a function of the improved offense and the big play mentality this season (as opposed to last year's ram it down their throat and keep their offense off the field approach). On the other, it could also be a function of our defense not getting off the field as quickly and as often as it should. I'll also note that TOP is one of the most useless statistics out there, so I'm not going to fret over it too much.
On to the defense:
| Allowed | vs Virginia Tech | vs Florida Int. | vs North Texas |
| 1st Downs | 11 | 13 | 7 |
| 3rd Down | 2-12 (17%) | 7-17 (41%) | 4-14 (29%) |
| 4th Down | 0-1 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Total Yards | 155 | 214 | 187 |
| Passing | 91 | 213 | 126 |
| Comp-Att | 9-20 (45%) | 18-38 (64%) | 16-23 (70%) |
| Yards per pass | 4.6 | 5.6 | 5.5 |
| Rushing | 64 | 1 | 61 |
| Attempts | 31 | 26 | 26 |
| Yards per rush | 2.1 | 0.0 | 2.3 |
| Penalties | 6-45 | 8-54 | 3-27 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Fumbles | 2 | 0 | |
| INTs | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| TOP | 22:58 | 28:22 | 29:17 |
The first thing that pops out is the increase in third downs converted on our defense along with the increase in completion percentages through the air. Going from a lackluster offense like Virginia Tech's to two spread oriented attacks like FIU and North Texas will do that, of course, but what should also be noted is that our defense held both teams to only about 5 1/2 yards per play through the air (while our own was grabbing 7.7 per play in it's worst performance). Though we are allowing completions, we're keeping everything in front of us and not giving up big plays (or even many runs after catch).
Players of the Game
Offense: Greg McElroy
Once again, that honor has to go to young McElroy. As OTS noted in his initial impressions post, "ever since he took off in the Virginia Tech game, he has been practically unstoppable. I think he threw about one bad ball today, but aside from that his performance was completely flawless. And the amazing thing is that he has had three touchdown passes dropped the past two weeks, which means his already gaudy statistics ought to be even more inflated. I'm sure it won't be this good all year, but you would have been hard-pressed to even script a better debut for McElroy."
Honorable Mention: The Entire Receiving Corp
With all the preseason hype surrounding Julio Jones, he has been a total non-factor so far this season due mostly to injury, yet Alabama is still managing 244.7 yards per game through the air (5th in the league, though 2-5 are essentially tied with only about 5 yards per game difference among them) thanks in no small part to the other receivers (and TEs and RBs) stepping up in his absence. Eleven different players caught at least one pass on Saturday, and it seems like each game someone new is coming up big time and making a push for more balls to be thrown their way.
Defense: Mark Barron
With five total tackles, one tackle for loss (a 10 yard loss on a beautifully read receiver screen), and two pass breakups, Barron is starting to look a lot more comfortable in his starting role at safety.
Honorable Mention: Terrence Cody
The big man also had 5 total tackles and a tackle for loss in the game, and he and the rest of the d-line rotation wreaked havoc on the UNT line all day long, allowing us to drop more guys into coverage against their spread offense.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wouldn't worry about the time of possession stat...
…against a team like UNT. We had TD drives of 83, 67 & 67 last under three minutes each. Our T.o.P. just isn’t going to match what it is in harder fought games like VT where sustained drives are more of the norm.
Mostly agree about Barron
but it looked as if he was the one who missed his assignment on one of North Texas’s two or three big plays, and same thing last week…
am I mistaken?
Well...
It looked like McClain gave the go-ahead to blitz to Kareem, but either Reamer or Barron was supposed to pick up the WR that Kareem left. It may have not been all Barron.
by CaliforniaTide on Sep 20, 2009 6:02 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed...
Without getting the entire view of the field, it’s hard to guess one way or the other. I would normally think that it would be on Barron simply because I couldn’t think we’d normally give a guy like Reamer that responsibility against a linebacker, but still you never really know.
And making it worse, I haven’t seen any good enough footage of the play to see exactly what kind of cover package we were playing in the rest of the field.
by outsidethesidelines on Sep 20, 2009 11:04 PM CDT up reply actions
I watched the replay last night...
…and it’s hard to tell who it’s on. As the receiver drags both Reamer and Barron go with him leaving the back free on the wheel route, but the way each one was lined up it could have been either one’s responsibility (Barron was up pretty close to the line). If I had to guess, I’d say it was on Reamer since he seemed to adjust quickest to what was going on like he suddenly realized “oh shit, the back!”
Roll Bama Roll - The Champagne of Bama Blogs.
Anticipating Arkansas and a statistical observation
I’m curious how we fare statistically next week. I’ll be totally (and happily) shocked if Arkansas has less than 200 yards passing, but I expect them to move the ball through the air for about 300 yards and to score in the 20s. Which means that statistically it may look like we underperformed. But, in the era of the spread, I think points allowed is waaaay more important than yards allowed. Just look at VA Tech and Texas yesterday. The Hokies gave up a ton of yards, but only FGs, and won. Texas gave up a lot of yards and a decent amount of points, but if you’re a Horns fan you had to love Muschamp’s game plan. So, while I think we’ll beat the Hogs … not guaranteeing, just sayin … it’ll be interesting to see how the stats correlate to said victory.
"That rug really tied the room together."
That's why...
…I think its important to note how we’ve done as far as yards per attempt goes. Even if you break it down as yards per completion you get 11.8 against FIU and a drop to 7.8 against UNT, (we’re at 10.00 ypc on the year, and 13th in the country against the pass) which really isn’t that bad. The important thing is that, even though we are allowing a high percentage of completions in the last two games, we aren’t letting them go for big gains or letting them turn into big gains as runs after catch. Further, no one has been able to run on us yet so you’re going to see a lot of teams going to this quick pass approach as well, and that’s just hard to defend as far as completion percentage goes.
Roll Bama Roll - The Champagne of Bama Blogs.
at some point this weekend i heard (or read) someone say...
…the solution to the spread is at nose guard.
if i recall correctly, the argument was that having an above-average defensive line, particularly at the middle, keeps a spread team from establishing the run and reduces the need of the defense to play close.
i think the example of this was tennessee, who stymied florida draw play which is the precursor for their option attack. with the run out of the way, they could focus on shortening the field and letting berry have his way with whatever got out of the backfield.
the point seemed to be that if you have a beast of a noseguard, he accounts for the tackler and the running back, creating a disparity of numbers elsewhere (i could be mistaken in my explanation).
needless to say this should sound more than passing familiar to crimson tide fans. first of all due to the behemoth of a noseguard you probably have heard plays for us. and, secondly, due to the defensive philosophy of coach saban (if you are unfamiliar get thyself over to smart football and get reading right now, son!). to wit:
[Our] philosophy on first and second down is to stop the run and play good zone pass defense. We will occasionally play man-to-man and blitz in this situation. On third down, we will primarily play man-to-man and mix-in some zone and blitzes. We will rush four or more players versus the pass about ninety-percent of the time.
"In all situations, we will defend the inside or middle of the field first – defend inside to outside. Against the run, we will not allow the ball to be run inside. We want to force the ball outside. Against the pass, we will not allow the ball to be thrown deep down the middle or inside. We want to force the ball to be thrown short and/or outside.
so it seems to me, if the spread is the question, coach saban has the solution. i plan to watch the arkansas game with this very much in mind.
by kleph on Sep 20, 2009 9:23 PM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
That was Gary Danielson...
… who said that, and in many ways he is right.
If you have a damn good nose player, you can hold your own against interior runs at the point of attack without having to commit much else to stopping the run. That allows you to play a lot of five and six defensive back sets trying to stop a spread passing game.
On the other hand, though, the problem you have is if you cannot really hold them at the point of attack with the defensive line, the opposing team can spread the field and when you spread the field defensively to match it, they just absolutely gut you with interior runs. You saw Florida do that a ton last year… they’d spread the field and a guy like Percy Harvin would take the hand-off on a simple dive play and he’d go 15 yards before someone ever even got a finger on him.
And, of course, if you then have to go with only four (or at most five) defensive backs just to keep from getting gutted on interior runs, then that really stretches you thin against the pass. It’s at that point you end up getting some mix of speedy athletic guys matched on linebackers, man-to-man coverage on the outside, or zones that are stretched really thin where the defensive backs are required to successfully cover a massive amount of territory.
What can you say? All the hype goes to the QB’s and the skill position guys, but the game nevertheless largely begins and ends at the point of attack. You win there and you almost can’t do anything wrong, and you lose there and you almost can’t do anything right.
by outsidethesidelines on Sep 20, 2009 11:13 PM CDT up reply actions
I'm very impressed with McElroy's observations after the FIU game..
like having a problem on 3rd down conversions, last week 30% and Saturday 72% – check
And the play calling on 3rd down has changed where as before, a 3rd and 4, they would run for 4, Saturday 3rd and 2 on the 30 yard line, touchdown pass – check
I like the direction the Tide is going. I know Saban put Jackson in to prepare for the Tide’s future, but it won’t help McElroy heisman hopes.
Did you see Greg made the front page of ESPN’s College Footbal website !!
Got that winning feelin'
The Heisman...
…is for losers. We like glass footballs and such.
by NiceLittleSaturday on Sep 20, 2009 8:43 PM CDT up reply actions

by 




















