Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How The Kings Beat The Coyotes: Lather, Rinse, Repeat

Alabama's 2010 Regular Season By The Numbers

With the 2010 regular season on the books and just the bowl game left to put a post script on the proceedings, it is probably time to start looking at what has transpired over the past three months with a bit of perspective. God knows it's not likely to take away the sting of November any time soon but it could possibly put a jump start on coming to terms with it all.

Keep in mind, this is not intended as any type of definitive analysis but rather it's a first glance at the numbers as we start to examine the 2010 season in retrospect. With that in mind, perhaps the best place to start is with the old mainstay's of measuring production -- yardage totals. Here are the regular season rushing and passing yards for the Alabama Crimson Tide over the past three seasons: (All the data used here is via the University of Alabama Athletic Department.)

2010bamayardsnew_medium
Regular season games only. Touchdowns for each category indicated in white.

Given the amount of talent in the backfield this season, the decline of the running game this year is simply astonishing. Alabama finished 12th in the nation last year in yards per game. They are 35th this season. And nowhere was the dropoff more painfully apparent than in the case of Mark Ingram.

The boy from Flint, Michigan garnered just 596 yards this year (although he missed two games to injury), an almost 60% decrease in production from his Heisman Trophy-winning campaign. Last year Ingram had seven 100-yard games (and came one yard from doing so against LSU) in 2010 he was able to surpass 100 yards in just two contests, Duke and Arkansas (although he fell just three yards short of the century mark against, once again, LSU).

The obvious beneficiary of this anemic rushing attack was Julio Jones whose 1,084 yards receiving was almost double his 2009 regular season total. And that was despite having surgery to put a pin in his fractured left hand at the season's halfway point. Tough, you ain't.

What is interesting is that the scoring production of this offense was certainly looks better than the prior two seasons but really wasn't when compared to the field. This year Alabama is 21st in the nation in scoring offense, exactly the same as last year.

Which leads us to ask, how did the Alabama defense fare in comparison with the prior two regular seasons? Well the answer is below but I warn you, if you miss Terrence Cody then this graph might make you weep openly:

2010oppyardsnew_medium
Regular season games only. Touchdowns for each category indicated in white.

As much hand wringing that was done over the green Crimson Tide secondary the real weakness of this defense was the inability to stop the run. Not only did the Alabama defense allow opposing offenses to earn more than 1,000 yards on the ground during the regular season for the first time since 2007 they permitted a whopping 60% more yards than last year. Yeesh.

While the touchdown numbers for 2010 don't seem incredibly out of whack with the past it's worth considering that the difference between an undefeated season and one with three losses is less than three touchdowns. The Crimson Tide's three losses this season were by a total of 18 points and last year's Alabama defense allowed four fewer touchdowns than the 2010 edition. The truth is the margin of error at the top is razor thin. This year Alabama is 5th in the nation in scoring defense, last year the Crimson Tide was third.

Please join us after the jump as we take a gander at a few other statistical categories in a bit more detail...

Star-divide

Clearly, the number of yards alone is of limited value. So lets take a look at the statistic which roughly correlates to the ability to keep drives alive, third down conversions. Overall, Alabama mustered a 43% third down conversion rate in 2010, a good four percentage points better than 2009. Conversely, the Crimson Tide allowed opponents to convert on third down 34% of the time during the regular season, four percentage points worse than 2009.

Here is the tally by game:

20103rddownconv_medium

In this context, the woes of the offense are pretty clear. Alabama's productivity peaked with Arkansas and went into a steady decline for the next three weeks. Tennessee offered an opportunity for rejuvenation but outside of the outlier of the Georgia State game, the whole of November saw a continued and increasing malaise in the efficiency of the offense. 

While the deep strikes against the Mississippi State secondary put that game in the bag by halftime and gave reason to believe the vertical passing threat problem had been solved, the underlying issues with offensive production came back to haunt us in the Iron Bowl. And don't even talk to me about LSU. 

On the defensive side of the ball you see Alabama allowed South Carolina to convert on third down more than half the time. That's not a recipe for success. Interestingly, we were almost as ineffective against Mississippi State but that game never was close. Auburn's vaunted high-octane offense couldn't convert even a third of the time against the Tide but the inability of Alabama to score after the first quarter made that enough to get the win.

The same issues are apparent in the Red Zone numbers for the 2010 regular season. Alabama earned 4.3 points per red zone visit (53 attempts) this year while allowing opponents 3.1 points when they encroached inside the Crimson Tide 20-yard-line (29 attempts). In 2009 Alabama had 4.02 points (59 attempts) and opponents only mustered 2.5 (24 attempts). Game by game, the points/attempt looked like this:

Redzone2010_medium

Obviously, the two games that stand out here are South Carolina and LSU. The Gamecocks scored a touchdown each of the four times they entered the red zone. Alabama's four times into the red zone only garnered a touchdown and field goal. The result was predictable when looked at with this metric but the outcome of the LSU game certainly wasn't. The Crimson Tide earned a touchdown each time they got within the LSU 20-yard-line while holding the Bayou Bengals to a point-and-a-half less but still couldn't pull out the win.

Defensively, this is a category where the difference between a three-loss season and perfection is microscopic. The 2010 Crimson Tide defense was sixth in the country for opponent's red zone conversions. Last year's National Championship-winning squad was third.

So while all this might shed a bit of light on one or two points it seems to fall short of offering a smoking gun for what ailed the Crimson Tide in 2010. Perhaps the most reasonable assessment to make from this right now is that this was a pretty good Alabama team but certainly not a great one. More importantly, the the room for improvement dosent seem to be an unfathomable gulf between where this team is at and where their impressive potential suggest they could be.

Comment 45 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Wow...

…when you put it in black and white (and red and pink) like this, the situation looks pretty bleak. Here’s hoping next year’s stats look amazing in comparison.

I will say, though, that the presence of charts and graphs go a long way towards making it all better.

by Queen of the Universe on Dec 8, 2010 10:09 AM CST reply actions  

I actually find this data rather encouraging.

For all the hand-wringing about youth and inexperience, the raw data doesn’t show as steep a dropoff as I perceived from watching the games. This data (coupled with the intensity that our defense finally displayed in the first half of the IB) gives me great confidence in our ability to bounce back to the top of the heap sooner rather than later.

"I’d love to be inoculated against stupid" - Thomas Walker Esq, RBR Knowledge Dropper

by Slice of Life on Dec 8, 2010 10:14 AM CST reply actions  

I do think the numbers

for this year actaully look a little better than they should for this reason: Last years non conference schedule was a bit more difficult than this years. Va Tech>PSU, North Texas>SJSU, FIU>Duke, Chat> GSU. Against such weak non conference teams, except PSU who is only average, we should have put up a bit better stats than last years non conference.

I’d like to compare SEC stats from 09 and 10. Admitely our SEC schedule may have been harder with the road games, the byes, and UF taking the place of UK. But I think in the conference I would expect to see a bigger drop off this year.

If Auburn was in New Mexico and we never played them I would still hate them and their dumb coach and their cheating players.

by 5026 on Dec 8, 2010 10:15 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

FIU>Duke?

FWIW, according to Sagarin FIU finished last season ranked #134. Duke is currently #93.

You’re mostly correct on the others:
VT was #7. PSU is #50.
NT was #160. SJSU is #155.
UTC was #146. GSU is #194.

QUACK QUACK!!

by CarrotTop4 on Dec 8, 2010 11:24 AM CST up reply actions  

I thought FIU was going to a bowl.

That is why I said they were better than Duke.

And, I guess you could change it to say Chatt> SJSU and NT>GSU. Still think this years non conference was weaker than last year by a mile.

If Auburn was in New Mexico and we never played them I would still hate them and their dumb coach and their cheating players.

by 5026 on Dec 8, 2010 2:33 PM CST up reply actions  

FIU is going to a bowl this year,

but it’s the first time in their history to do so.

The real difference in OOC this year vs last year is just that VT was good last year and PSU turned out to be not so good this year.

QUACK QUACK!!

by CarrotTop4 on Dec 8, 2010 3:02 PM CST up reply actions  

By a mile?

Exaggerate much?

'There are two pains in life. There is the pain of discipline and the pain of disappointment. If you can handle the pain of discipline, then you'll never have to deal with the pain of disappointment,'- Nick Saban

by J Tadpole on Dec 9, 2010 6:30 AM CST up reply actions  

I’ve tried telling him a billion times to stop exaggerating.

by Bumpjon on Dec 9, 2010 9:42 AM CST up reply actions  

Arky ’10 (at home) > Arky ’09 (in BDS)
USC ’10 (at home) > USC ’09 (in BDS)
LSU ’10 (at home) > LSU ’09 (in BDS)
MSU ’10 > MSU ’09
Cam Newton > Barn ’09

All in all, I would venture to say this year’s schedule was tougher than last year.

by Bumpjon on Dec 8, 2010 1:08 PM CST up reply actions  

FWIW on that question,

Sagarin rated our schedule last year as #2 and this year it’s at #17. Of course that #2 last year was including the SEC championship and the bowl game. If you just looked at regular season, it should be closer.

QUACK QUACK!!

by CarrotTop4 on Dec 8, 2010 1:23 PM CST up reply actions  

I find it strange that the opposite of what we thought preseason

actually happened. The offensive numbers are worse than expected and the defensive numbers are better. I think next year we may see the same trend. Our defense should continue to get better and our offense will be an “unknown” with the assumption we lose both Julio and Ingram, and will be breaking in a new LT and QB.

by skegler on Dec 8, 2010 10:22 AM CST reply actions  

Well

we certainly had our shortcomings on both sides of the ball this year.
I suppose this was expected on the defensive side because of all those
graduations. The real disappointment to me was the offense. I’m not
sure that any one thing can be pointed to as the definitive blame-
injuries, substandard line play, poor offensive play calling, poor
execution, lack of competitive fire. I suppose it’s a combination of
all the above. There is one low point of the season that really goads me-
the performance of the offense after the first quarter of the Iron Bowl.
Dropped passes, fumbles, poor play calling and loosing the emotional
edge was a tough thing to watch. I just wish that Coach Saban would
have chewed out the entire offense during that game as he did A.J.
that time. I had rather Auburn come out and beat us like a drum than
to have choked and pissed the game away like we did.
For now, though, we need to rally the troops and play our best
against Michigan State. I’m optimistic about next years talent,
especially on defense.

by hkfan on Dec 8, 2010 10:37 AM CST reply actions  

Agree about the Irong Bowl

The Barn almost should thank Bama if they win the NC because we just gave it away. Worst loss in all my years as a Bama fan. But we will overcome and move forward to 2011!

Baptman

by baptman on Dec 8, 2010 12:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Mark it down...

…but Ingram’s fumble really got the ball rolling on our loss to the Barn. Trent pretty much dropped the ball as well. And GMac? By the end of the game, it was like he wasn’t even on the field. Of course, our line play was offensive. And our TE was just plain Smelley. The receivers seemed to be running around in a Maze. For much of the 4th quarter, I was really Jonesing for Julio.

And don’t get me started on the other side of the ball. There’s little defense for what they did.

"High standards come from passion within...." --Coach Nick Saban

by NiceLittleSaturday on Dec 8, 2010 11:39 PM CST up reply actions  

but Ingram’s fumble really got the ball rolling on our loss to the Barn...

I’m trying to figure out whether it is worse if this was on purpose or on accident

Thirteen.

by Darth Saban on Dec 11, 2010 1:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Nevermind.

Just read the rest of the post.

Thirteen.

by Darth Saban on Dec 11, 2010 1:10 AM CST up reply actions  

To paraphrase...

“It’s the line play, stupid”

Offensively, everything begins with opening holes for the RBs and QB protection.

Defensively, the line must stop the run and pressure the QB.

" I imagine it is safe to assume that the Newton family has retained the services of a lawyer."-OTS

by UtahBammer on Dec 8, 2010 10:38 AM CST reply actions  

It's a central principle of Saban's defensive philosophy:

Dominate the middle of the field on run defense, right?

Here’s hoping Jesse Williams can come in and give us a more Cody-like presence quickly.

by Jeff Jones on Dec 8, 2010 12:50 PM CST up reply actions  

The only surprise for me...

is the balance in the offense in terms of where our points came from (24 pass and 23 rush)and our inefficiency on the whole as an offense!? How efficient was our running game?

"It's not the size of the cat in the fight, it's size of the fight in the cat"

"Pep talks... only work when they touch that ember of truth learned the hardest possible way on the field.-Kleph

by thecalicocat on Dec 8, 2010 10:47 AM CST reply actions  

Yeah, a comparison of rush success rates would be interesting, though I would guess not very pleasant.

by zeke2029 on Dec 8, 2010 11:53 AM CST up reply actions  

OL

You can’t hang all of the rushing blame on MI or TR. The OL has to take some of it and no one has been able to explain to me the HUGE step back that they took from last year. This was supposed to be the team with the nearly unstoppable offense and while the passing game certainly improved, that was almost a necessity out of a lack of production from the running game.

by tide96 on Dec 8, 2010 10:52 AM CST reply actions  

Couple of thoughts

Offense – clearly we couldn’t dominate in the run game as in the past. I agree with previous poster that line play was a key factor. I also think Ingram and TR spent a good amount of time dinged up…

Defense – Cody was a tremendous loss no doubt, no one ran up the middle last year, but McClain for me was the biggest loss. Hightower didn’t fill his shoes in the way we’d hoped and that had a big impact on run defense. Also, Dareus was out for 4 games and we really had no one else step up on the d-line the way we say Dareus step up last year.

Just didn’t quite come together this year, but I also agree with previous posters that we’ll be much stronger next year, even without Ingram and Julio and GMc.

by Richard Rodgers on Dec 8, 2010 10:53 AM CST reply actions  

Based on defensive and offensive stats, Bama was good

enough to compete for a NC. The OL and DL concerns/weaknesses are real enough and well documented. Not trying to make excuses, but it seems the main problem was the inability to make a few plays down the stretch vs LSU and AU. Bama made those plays in 2009….see TN and AU games.

All my friends are nonconformists, so I decided to be one too

by boomerdude on Dec 8, 2010 10:57 AM CST reply actions  

The ball just didn't bounce right a few times

If anyone were to look at the Iron Bowl stats in depth without knowing the score they’d figure Bama won by 7-10 points. Football is a funny game.

'There are two pains in life. There is the pain of discipline and the pain of disappointment. If you can handle the pain of discipline, then you'll never have to deal with the pain of disappointment,'- Nick Saban

by J Tadpole on Dec 8, 2010 11:10 AM CST via mobile reply actions  

Another thing to take into effect

Our injury and fumble luck was not even close to as good as it was last season. We hardly ever recovered a fumble, and the injuries began to add up. The Iron Bowl, for example: Mark Barron tears his pectoral, Barrett Jones was injured, Julio gets banged up and has to miss the most important drive of the game, and then Greg gets knocked out with a concussion. If even one of those guys remains healthy, we probably get the win. Also, our special teams play wasn’t as spectacular as it was in 2009.

by Bamabrave4 on Dec 8, 2010 11:15 AM CST reply actions  

Eh,

I’d say special teams was nearly a wash. Returns weren’t as good, but coverage was probably better. We hardly ever missed a FG, and aside from the occasional shank, punting wasn’t that bad.

"I’d love to be inoculated against stupid" - Thomas Walker Esq, RBR Knowledge Dropper

by Slice of Life on Dec 8, 2010 11:24 AM CST up reply actions  

FG kicking was a big worry for me.

I was afraid we’d lose a close game or two because of it. Maybe I’m still traumatized from the Leigh Tiffin Nightmare in Fayetteville.

by Jeff Jones on Dec 8, 2010 12:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks, kleph

The numbers are not all that discouraging. Sure, there is decline in some categories from the last couple of years but improvements in other categories. Given our schedule, we were statistically good enough to beat anybody.

I agree with those who have said that, when compared to the last two years, we just didn’t get as many breaks this year. We had more impact injuries this year than the last two years combined. We rarely got a lucky bounce (we had players surrounding the ball when our punt bounced off the LSU player’s foot right back into his arms and the odds of being able to punch a ball 25 yards out of someone’s grip when it is less than a yard form going out of bounds have to be extremely low).

It was a tough year. We didn’t play as well as we wanted to but the future looks pretty bright.

by toofull on Dec 8, 2010 11:32 AM CST reply actions  

Defense was the key

Our offense has never been dynamic but we still scored 7 more TDs than the last two seasons. The reason, I believe, for the running games issues may have been the inability of the defense to stop the run and get off the field. The ‘08 and’09 defenses were able to create many 3 and outs and when that happens an O-line can be on the field more and begin to wear people down. Often our best rushing came in the second half in’08 and ’09, but not this year. Our O-line must improve, but so must the front 7 of the D.

Baptman

by baptman on Dec 8, 2010 12:26 PM CST reply actions  

Youth and inexperience

had the most to do with our struggles. It affected our leadership and we lost that edge we had last year. Losing McClain and Jackson to the NFL really hurt us. Sometimes I like to daydream and think of what would have been had they been playing. Then I wake up.
But I believe, AND AM SURE, CNS will have them ready for MSU Jan 1. And I know he’ll have em hungry for next year. Hopefully we can overcome the loss of Julio (who I think will be the biggest loss, when do you EVER get that quality a player and person) and either AJ or PS or both will step up and be big.
We have such a good foundation now. It really is a great time to be a Bama fan.

"I do whatever they want me to do," he said. "I’ll punt it if that’s what they want." Julio Jones after rushing for a 56 yd TD vs Miss. St.

by coachrob on Dec 8, 2010 12:36 PM CST reply actions  

Losing Ro really hurt the defense.

Not much,if any leadership on defense.

RBR resident Dogcaller.

by Crimsoncaller on Dec 8, 2010 12:48 PM CST reply actions  

we gave up 13 td's last year and

17 this year?

If we give up 13 td’s this year, we win every game. Wow.

by Tidee Whitee on Dec 8, 2010 1:33 PM CST reply actions  

That is simply not true.

For example, we could have shut out Tennessee, Duke and Arkansas and still had the same record.

We likely would have won another game, or as a remote possibility, all of them. Odds are we still lose to SC.

by krnxprs on Dec 8, 2010 1:37 PM CST up reply actions  

We could have shut out Arky?

If Auburn was in New Mexico and we never played them I would still hate them and their dumb coach and their cheating players.

by 5026 on Dec 8, 2010 2:36 PM CST up reply actions  

I was just hastily trying to come up with 4 touchdowns to erase from the books.

by krnxprs on Dec 8, 2010 4:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Im talking about well-placed defense.

Reduce aubies final core by 1 td we win
reduce lsu’s final score by 1 td we win
reduce sc’s final score by 2 td’s we tie/who knows?

by Tidee Whitee on Dec 9, 2010 9:34 AM CST up reply actions  

Some suggestions.

Kleph, I always enjoy the statistical analysis, and I’m really glad your redzone analysis included average points rather than scoring percentages. It looks like you didn’t include PATs in your numbers though. I know it’s difficult to get an accurate number since you’d have to look at the play-by-plays to account for 2-pt conversions and missed kicks. But without including the PAT, you lose the proper valuation of TDs versus FGs. As a compromise, I prefer to call it “expected points per redzone trip” rather than the average and just assume that a TD is worth 7 points. I think it’s close enough to the true average that the difference would not be enough to sway any arguments .

Also, I don’t think it would be too difficult to include fourth down attempts in the third down conversion statistics. I think it’s a better metric if the purpose is to measure your success at stopping opponent’s drives. For instance, earlier this year we at one point led the nation in 3rd down defense, but I thought that number might be misleading at the time because I remembered us giving up a number of 4th down conversions. I’d use the formula (3rd down conversions + 4th down conversions) / 3rd down attempts.

by krnxprs on Dec 8, 2010 1:37 PM CST reply actions  

Thanks Kleph,

for putting this together. We were a good football team this year…not great. Considering the talent we are accumulating, and the staff to coach them up, the sky is the limit for this team next year…and the year after that. It’s a great comfort to me, to know we are building our program back to the level we know and love..a juggernaut, always tough, and deep in talent. The future looks bright , to me.

"...because you've got your mind right, and that's the way we like it." Nick Saban

by SRGBama on Dec 8, 2010 11:20 PM CST reply actions  

Talent...

…is undeniably there. Recruiting rankings are one thing, but I was looking at the coaches’ All-SEC team picks today, and we have, by far, more returning first- and second-team All-SEC players than any team in the SEC. We will return All-SEC guys at anywhere between 7 and 11 positions, depending on who decides to jump to the NFL early. Arkansas? 2 to 4. Auburn? 0 to 2 (and my guess is 0). LSU? 1 to 3. Granted, a few players do not a team make, but it’s a decent indicator of the recruiting work CNS has done since January 2007…and hopefully how happy we’ll be January 2011. RTR.

"High standards come from passion within...." --Coach Nick Saban

by NiceLittleSaturday on Dec 8, 2010 11:30 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog covering the Alabama Crimson Tide.

FanPosts

Roll Bama Roll on Twitter


Managers

Disreputable_small Todd

Miltonf-788904_small outsidethesidelines

Kyp2_small Nico2.0

Editors

Kleph_logo_copy_small kleph

Green_small Matt Dover