Roll 'Bama Roll: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

Selection Sunday special: NIT invite unlikely, but possible

Now that this week's conference tournament results are in, it has become evident that the Crimson Tide basketball team's chances for an NIT invite are still alive, but not all that strong. In what follows, I'll break down the situation from top to bottom to show you where we stand heading into Selection Sunday.

For those who don't want to take the time to go through the whole break-down, the Tide will need a little bit of luck as the selection committee makes their decisions. If it were like the old days and the NIT was simply the top 32 major-conference teams not in the Big Dance, we would be a shoo-in. Even if it was simply the best 32 teams, I would feel pretty good about us getting an invite. But alas, that's not the case. As of 2006, the NIT also reserves spots for automatic qualifiers, and there were 8 of them this year. So we are actually trying to be one of the top 24 teams left out of the Big Dance, and not only are we competing against the name schools who didn't get invited like North Carolina and Arizona, but we're also competing against the quality mid-major schools who had great years but didn't quite make the cut for the Big Dance. Keep in mind, there are 343 Division I basketball teams out there, much different than the 120 FBS football teams.

One bit of good news for us, though: The NIT selection committee is chaired by none other than former Bama coach C.M. Newton, who led the Tide to 3 SEC championships and 6 post-season appearances in 12 seasons at the Capstone from 1969-1981. Newton also played a semi-formal consulting role for UA when his old friend Mal Moore began his search for Mark Gottfried's replacement last year. Newton reportedly was very high on hiring Grant and supposedly lobbied to bring him to Tuscaloosa. I doubt this will have any significant impact on our chances, but it's interesting to note nonetheless.

That said, I strongly encourage everyone to read below the jump to see how it all breaks down and where we stand heading into Selection Sunday...

UPDATE: I've included today's results in the tournament break-downs.

Star-divide

First, let's take a look at how the automatic bids were assigned for both the NCAA and NIT tournaments. Each of the 31 Division I basketball conferences is listed in the table below in order of the conferences' rank in the RPI. Each of the 31 conference tournament winners is guaranteed a spot in the NCAA tournament. Those tournament winners that are projected to be top-11 seeds--in other words, those who would have been chosen as at-large teams even without winning their tournaments--I have categorized as "NCAA at-large" under the column "Winner Status" to distinguish between those teams who got in solely by winning their conference tournaments and those who did not. For those tournament winners projected as 12-seeds and lower, I have categorized "NCAA automatic" under the column "Winner Status". You will see that 19 of the conference tournament winners are projected as seeds such that they got in only as automatic bids, while the other 12 tournament winners (including the four crowned today) would have gotten in without the automatic bid.

Meanwhile, there were also 31 regular season conference champions. 17 of those champions went on to win their conference tournaments, guaranteeing them a spot in the NCAA tournament. Of the remaining 14 champions, 6 lost in their conference tournament but are expected to qualify as at-large teams. That leaves 8 conference champions who lost in their conference tournaments and will not qualify for the NCAA tournament as at-large teams. Those 8 will receive automatic bids to the NIT.

Conference Champion Champ Status Tournament Winner Winner Status
Big XII Kansas ----> Kansas NCAA at-large
Big East Syracuse NCAA at-large West Virginia NCAA at-large
ACC Duke ----> Duke NCAA at-large
SEC Kentucky ----> Kentucky
NCAA at-large
Big Ten Ohio State ----> Ohio State
NCAA at-large
A-10 Temple ----> Temple NCAA at-large
MWC New Mexico NCAA at-large San Diego State NCAA at-large
Pac-10 Cal NCAA at-large Washington NCAA at-large
MVC Northern Iowa ----> Northern Iowa NCAA at-large
WAC Utah State NCAA at-large New Mexico State NCAA automatic
C-USA UTEP NCAA at-large Houston NCAA automatic
CAC Old Dominion ----> Old Dominion NCAA at-large
WCC Gonzaga NCAA at-large Saint Mary's NCAA at-large
Horizon Butler ----> Butler NCAA at-large
MAAC Siena ----> Siena NCAA at-large
MAC Kent State NIT automatic Ohio NCAA automatic
Southern Wofford ----> Wofford NCAA automatic
Big Sky Weber State NIT automatic Montana NCAA automatic
Big West UCSB ----> UCSB NCAA automatic
OVC Murray State ----> Murray State NCAA automatic
SBC Troy NIT automatic North Texas NCAA automatic
Ivy Cornell ----> Cornell NCAA at-large
Summit Oakland ----> Oakland NCAA automatic
AEC Stony Brook NIT automatic Vermont NCAA automatic
ASC Jacksonville NIT automatic East Tennessee State NCAA automatic
Southland Sam Houston State ----> Sam Houston Sate NCAA automatic
Big South Coastal Carolina NIT automatic Winthrop NCAA automatic
Patriot Lehigh ----> Lehigh NCAA automatic
NEC Quinnipiac NIT automatic Robert Morris NCAA automatic
MEAC Morgan State ----> Morgan State NCAA automatic
SWAC Jackson State NIT automatic Arkansas-Pine Bluff NCAA automatic
8 NIT auto bids 17 NCAA auto bids

 

Since 17 (technically 31, but 14 of those would have qualified as at-large teams anyway) of the 65 NCAA bids will go to automatic qualifiers, there will be 48 spots open for the top 48 teams in the country, as determined by the NCAA selection committee.

According to ESPN's bracket experts, the following 42 teams are considered locks to be among those 46 top teams (in order of expected seeding):

Kansas
Kentucky
Syracuse
Duke
West Virginia
Kansas State
Ohio State
Georgetown
Baylor
Villanova
Pittsburgh
Wisconsin
New Mexico
Purdue
Temple
Tennessee
Michigan State
Vanderbilt
Butler
BYU
Maryland
Texas A&M
Richmond
Xavier
Gonzaga
Cal
Northern Iowa
UNLV
Texas
Oklahoma State
Notre Dame
San Diego State

Marquette
UTEP
Florida State
Clemson
Louisville
Siena
Missouri
Georgia Tech
Old Dominion
Saint Mary's
Cornell
Washington

According to ESPN's bracket experts, the following 9 teams are "on the bubble" for contention for those final 4 NCAA at-large spots. The 5 teams from this group that are not chosen for the NCAA tournament are considered locks for the top 5 at-large spots in the NIT. (Listed in order of chances by ESPN)

Utah State
Wake Forest
Virginia Tech
Minnesota
Mississippi State
Illinois
Florida
Ole Miss
Seton Hall

Since 8 of the 32 NIT bids will go to automatic qualifiers, the NIT selection committee will choose the top 24 remaining teams in the country for at-large spots in the NIT. The five teams from the above group on the NCAA bubble who are not chosen by the NCAA committee will be locks for at-large spots in the NIT, so that will leave 19 spots. In addition to those teams, the following 13 teams are considered NIT locks by the websites Bracket Project and NIT-ology--pretty much the only two sites out there that track NIT projections. (Listed roughly in order of projected seeding)

Memphis
Arizona State
USF
UAB
Cincinnati
Dayton
Wichita State
UConn
Saint John's
William & Mary
Saint Louis
VCU
Tulsa

That leaves only 6 spots left for at-large teams in the NIT. Since the major sites like ESPN don't track the NIT and there isn't much media scrutiny on the NIT selection process, it's hard to say how the pecking order will go for the final teams chosen. Below I will mention 17 teams that the two NIT websites mention as possibilities for those final 6 spots. (Listed loosely in order of chances for being chosen)

Marshall
Nevada
Texas Tech
Northeastern
Illinois State
Arizona
NC State
North Carolina
Charlotte
Louisiana Tech
Wright State
Alabama
Portland
Fairfield
Iona
Missouri State
Miami

So there you have it. Alabama is one of about 17 or so teams fighting for the final half-dozen or so NIT at-large berths. We could very well be one of the teams who gets an invite, but simple probability states that there probably just aren't quite enough spots. Bottom line, if I had to bet one way or another, I'd bet against us getting an invite, but I wouldn't be surprised at all if we did, as we should at least be in the discussion at the NIT committee meeting.

One final note, it is in fact within the realm of possibility that should Alabama be chosen, we very well could be matched against UAB in the opening round. If the Tide does get in, it will most likely be as a #6 or #7 seed, meaning a matchup with a #3 or #2 seed. UAB will most likely be either a #2 or #3 seed. Even if we do get in and the seeds do line up that way, there is still only a one in four chance that we would even be in the same bracket as UAB. Just something to think about if we do get invited.

I'm certainly hoping for the best, as it would be great to give Torrance and Brock another run-out or two and give our returning players some valuable added practice time and post-season experience. If we are left out, as I'm afraid we will be, it will only give Grant and company extra time to hit those recruiting trails.

One way or another, the Process continues. Roll Tide.

0 recs  |  Comment 18 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Great Analysis.

After looking at it I’m just not that optimistic. Yet, I do think we are playing good right now so maybe that helps.

I hate the NCAA more than UT & AU combined. At least with UT & AU you got a fighting chance.

by 5026 on Mar 14, 2010 7:21 AM CST reply actions  

Excellent, Excellent stuff.

I think you it’s gonna shake out that the following get it:

UNC
Marshall
TTU
Northeastern
Nevada
Charlotte

With some deserving teams in the mid-70s getting bumped for No. Car. (who have been playing terribly). There are just too many folks in front of us, who have been more consistent, for us to jump teams like Iona and UNC and Ill. St. etc.

Now, I’m bummed.

"Hush now, let it go now. I know it's time to go. Time to let this fall from my hands" VNV Nation, "From My Hands"

by Stuck in the Plains on Mar 14, 2010 9:19 AM CDT reply actions  

curious when the last time UNC was resigned to the NIT

rather than the dance? and if we are to get in, is there any way to project how likely would it be that we would play Dayton or VCU??

"You have to create 6 seconds of hell each play..."
Coach Nick Saban

by LittleSis on Mar 14, 2010 10:09 AM CDT reply actions  

Dayton is possible, but VCU probably isn't

Dayton could be a #2 or #3 seed, but VCU will probably be lower than that

by Matt Dover on Mar 14, 2010 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Question will be...

if Bama gets overlooked if we bypass the CBI tournament. I would think Mal would sign off this year considering the extra time it would give CAG with the returning players.

I would prefer the chance this year as compared to the last time Mal passed on the invite. There is a chance to practice these guys more, vs the want to end a bad season last time.

It's not what you've done but what you are doing that matters.

by AlabamaJammer on Mar 14, 2010 10:56 AM CDT reply actions  

will we bypass the CBI

It's not what you've done but what you are doing that matters.

by AlabamaJammer on Mar 14, 2010 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

yes, we will only accept an NIT invite

in the past we have always turned down the CBI invite due to costs

by Matt Dover on Mar 14, 2010 11:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Washington wrapped the Pac-10 Tourney up

Cal is now a bubble team. Who would have believed the Pac-10 would be a one team league…

It's not what you've done but what you are doing that matters.

by AlabamaJammer on Mar 14, 2010 11:34 AM CDT reply actions  

Okay, I'm confused now Bama07

Notice you didn’t highlight the Washington tourney win as an automatic bid. I thought their tourney has been around enough to ensure the tourney winner gets the auto bid.

It's not what you've done but what you are doing that matters.

by AlabamaJammer on Mar 14, 2010 11:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

both are projected as at-large teams

going into the tournament, Cal was the only Pac-10 team projected to make it, and Washington does technically get the automatic bid for winning the tournament, but in winning those 3 games in a row to win the tournament, Washington improved their resume just enough to be projected as an 11-seed, meaning that they would just barely make the cut regardless of the automatic bid. Therefore I classified them, and all the other tournament winners projected as 11-seeds and higher, as at-large teams.

by Matt Dover on Mar 14, 2010 11:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

not a problem. I was actually referring to your chart above where auto qualifiers are in bold. All good though.

…and in other news Miss St is giving UK a run for their money. Wouldn’t it be funny if the two west division teams give UK the most fits, and with the Bulldogs taming the Cats.

It's not what you've done but what you are doing that matters.

by AlabamaJammer on Mar 14, 2010 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

this looks like a replay of our game

MSU is playing really hard and pretty well for the most part, built up a small halftime lead, but Wall is turning things up a notch for UK early in the second half. Let’s see if MSU can do a little better job stopping UK down the stretch than we did.

by Matt Dover on Mar 14, 2010 1:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Tennessee a 6 seed?!?!

say good night MSU, Florida, and Ole Miss…

by Matt Dover on Mar 14, 2010 5:15 PM CDT reply actions  

but Vandy a 4??

Weird. Most experts had UT higher than Vandy. Maybe the SEC isn’t that screwed after all, but all three bubble teams still have an uphill climb

by Matt Dover on Mar 14, 2010 5:19 PM CDT reply actions  

Minnesota in too.

Looking bleak for Mississippi State. Most experts didn’t give Ole Miss much of a chance anyway.

by Matt Dover on Mar 14, 2010 5:22 PM CDT reply actions  

Utah State in.

That should do it for the Mississippi teams

by Matt Dover on Mar 14, 2010 5:35 PM CDT reply actions  

and effectively do it for us.

It's not what you've done but what you are doing that matters.

by AlabamaJammer on Mar 14, 2010 5:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog covering the Alabama Crimson Tide.
Start posting about the Crimson Tide »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Us_small
Bama fans in Los Angeles
Small
Does anyone remember Auburn fans crowing about.....
Mcelroy_small
Thoughts on South Carolina?
Coaches-trophy_small
Progressive Insurance to Buy the BCS Championship game ?
0902-morgan-nationals-ap_606_small
Robbie Green

Recent FanPosts

Large_moore_small
Hello, my Alabama friends. No, that title stinks. RIP ENGLE IS EATING YOUR CAKE AND YOU WILL LIKE IT.
Small
Why I love RBR and you should too.....
Small
Joe Paterno interview
Ncf_g_mcclain1_sw_sq_600_small
Worst Alabama t-shirts/merchandise
Small
Replay of the game?
Koolaide_small
The SEC Is Weak(er)
Small
Red Cup Rebellion -- Blowing up on DC Tyrone Nix... EPIC Thread over there
Small
NEW SONG FOR GAME DAY!
Kleph_logo_copy_small
Coach Nick Saban Quotes
Sevent_seal_reaper_small
McElroy's media skills

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

FILE - In this Jan. 4, 2010 photo, Boise State's Kellen Moore (11) passes the ball against TCU during the second quarter in the Fiesta Bowl NCAA college football game  in Glendale, Ariz.   Much like the Boise State team he leads, Moore is more then sum of his part, an undersized and overlooked small-town kid who has turned out to be Heisman Trophy contender.  (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin) link

Everything You Need To Know For Boise State vs. Virginia Tech

ATLANTA - SEPTEMBER 4: Russell Shepard #10 of the LSU Tigers runs down the field for a touchdown against the North Carolina Tar Heels at the Georgia Dome September 4 2010 in Atlanta Georgia.  (Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images) +11 updates

LSU (Barely) Holds Off Depleted UNC, 30-24

Jacksonville State players celebrate their 49-48 double-overtime victory over Mississippi in an NCAA college football game in Oxford, Miss., Saturday, Sept. 4, 2010. (AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis) +3 updates

Jacksonville State Pulls Major Upset, Stuns Ole Miss In Double Overtime

More from SBNation.com >

Roll Bama Roll on Twitter


Managers

Large_hankwilliams_small Todd

Miltonf-788904_small outsidethesidelines

Kyp2_small Nico2.0

Author

Kleph_logo_copy_small kleph

Elebintytimeslolcat_small PeteHoliday

Green_small Matt Dover