RBR Reading Room: Crimson Slide
A few weeks ago I read one of the best books about Alabama football ever penned and, as if to even the karmic scales, the next one I had the chance to peruse was one of the worst.
The premise of Mike Flax's 2003 book, Crimson Slide: Why Alabama Football Fell and How It Can Climb Back On Top is certainly enticing: an Alabama practice squad player between 1997 and 1999 appeals to his buddies on those teams and pens an insider account of the turmoil that beset the program during that era.
Instead, what you get is more of a whiny rant from a few players who act like they had to run wind sprints a few too many times and decided they were going get back at the coach responsible.
Rather than any kind of insider account, Flax clearly despised former head coach Mike Dubose and Crimson Slide is the product of that. That it's his first book and suffers in terms of its composition certainly doesn't help matters much either.
A total of ten former players are on the record in the book and almost all of those are simply providing general comments. The bulk of information is provided by just two guys: linebacker Paul Pickett who only played for Mike Dubose his senior year and Jonathan Richey, a walk-on quarterback who languished behind Tyler Watts and Andrew Zow during his time in Tuscaloosa.
These two may have been stand up contributors to the Tide team but they come off here as disgruntled players with axes to grind and Flax has provided the perfect opportunity to do so.
The one member of the coaching staff quoted in book, former offensive coordinator Charlie Stubbs, does provide a helpful sliver of insight into the working of the Dubose's staff. But even his contribution becomes painfully self serving before too long.
I'm certainly not about to defend Dubose's tenure as Bama's HC as any kind of high water mark for the program, but neither do I think he was directly responsible for every single thing that went wrong with the team under his watch as Flax seems to believe.
The author despises Dubose to the point he actually commends Dennis Franchione's leadership and integrity with out a smidgen of irony. Conversely, the tenure of Gene Stallings is held up as an idyllic period to the point that Flax insists on overlooking or marginalizing the problems it bequeathed on the next coach.
As much as Stallings is rightfully revered by the Bama Nation, he did the football program no favors with his the handling of the Antonio Langham situation and the subsequent fallout from the NCAA. A book that professes to be an insider view of the team in that era would be expected to address these events in more than just a passing manner. The forfeiture of the 1993 season isn't even mentioned.
The result is a reader is inclined to dismiss all of Flax's complaints and that's regrettable since there a number of points he makes here that are dead-on correct; Dubose was obviously in way over his head as head coach, Bob Bockrath had absolutely no idea what the hell he was doing as Athletic Director and the lack of talent on the roster proved to be an insurmountable hurdle in conference play.
If you are looking for an account of the program from Stallings' time at The Capstone to the arrival of Coach Saban you're much better off picking up Donald Staffo's recent effort Alabama Football or, even better, check out outsidethesidelines account posted right here on Roll Bama Roll.
Eventually what Crimson Slide succeeds in making a compelling case that the Alabama program had gone seriously awry in the late 1990s, but not for the reasons it outlines. What becomes obvious is that the players on the squad were almost completely overcome with their own sense of entitlement despite producing producing mediocre records to warrant it.
deserves credit for the 1999 SEC championship.
Worse, the program had run so far amok that the players are unable to perceive how pathetic they had become.
What becomes apparent reading Crimson Slide is the Alabama locker room was as much a part of the problem for the program's mediocrity as anything done by the coaches ostensibly in charge.
The book constantly emphasizes how everyone but the players were to blame for the shortcomings on the football field after 1997. Out of condition? Bad conditioning program. Discontent in the locker room? Remote head coaching style. SEC Championship in 1999? Dumb luck and not that good a season anyway.
In one of the rare moments of honesty, Flax illustrates the problem flat out:
"Between 1997 and 2000 [Dubose's] players suffered massive injuries, skipped workouts or slacked through workouts, and scored bad grades in easy classes," Flax writes. "The majority of the 1997 class did not last or reach their potential. Of the 26 signees in 1997, 15 players were kicked off the team or transferred to other schools, or quit. "
Yes, the head coach is accountable for this but the responsibility of living up to the demands of being a championship-caliber team lies solely on the shoulders of the players. By Flax's account, the very idea that accountability should precede their own sense of entitlement seems to have never crossed their minds - a fact hammered home as the one player who seems to do this is held up as a negative example in the narrative.
Flax chastises Dubose for harboring favorites such as standout running back Shaun Alexander (who obviously was not interviewed for the book) and then presents anecdotes of the star running back's behavior in the locker room to support the contention. But in these instances Alexander is clearly assuming leadership and challenging his teammates to rise to the challenges facing them. That they chose not to certainly isn't a reflection on him.
Crimson Slide doesn't stop there though. Flax finishes his book with a chapter on how he believes the Alabama football program could be fixed and to call the suggestions appalling would be understating how horrifically bad they are.
He insists that the program needs to seek out blue chip players, and give them everything they want - up to and including paying them - since that's the only way to retain such talent. Worse, he insists that the Athletic Department should focus all of its attention on football at the expense of every other sport.
"Until the Alabama Athletics department spoils their breadwinners The Crimson Tide will continue to suffer through mediocrity and unparalleled disappointment," he writes. "Truth be told you're either all football, or no football."
I'm going to simply assume that Crimson Slide is more revealing about the author's personal biases than an kind of realistic representation of the Alabama teams it purports to give the "inside story" about. One thing is for sure, the players it depicts wouldn't have lasted very long under Coach Nick Saban.
Next week: Braggin Rights
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Your right about Stallings and
Langham. I believe Langham came to Coach Stallings the day after he had signed with an agent right after the Sugar Bowl. Rather than going straight to the NCAA, Stallings just told Langham not to worry about it. We could have avoided the whole mess that really plaqued us for over decade if we had handle the situation properly.
Coach Stallings was a great coach but he made some mistakes too.
I hate the NCAA more than UT & AU combined. At least with UT & AU you got a fighting chance.
Based on the review, it's hard to be impressed...
First and foremost, I think you have a problem with a walk-on writing a book basically a couple of years after graduating, especially when much of the account is based on what was said by someone who had merely graduated a few months prior. When you do that, I think you are more likely to get seat-of-the-pants reaction and a lot of people with axes to grind. Really, I think this is one of those things that would be better served by a few years of reflection before pen hits paper.
Kleph, I think, nails it on the entitlement issue. Clearly it is the head coach who is ultimately responsible, but to assume that the players are just raw pieces of clay to be shaped by coaches and completely absolved of any responsibility is erroneous. I do think that accounts like this showcase that, while in many cases we were recruiting very talented players, we were largely recruiting the wrong type of people. What I mean by that is players who may have had a significant amount of raw talent, but players who on a personal level did not have the requisite desire and mental ability to understand the difficulty of the task at hand and the enormous sacrifices that would be required to have long-term success. Instead, we had a lot of talented players who felt that winning would just be the natural end result, and who looked to blame everyone else when that inevitably did not come to fruition. Character isn’t everything of course — talent matters too — but this little episode is a good showcase that raw talent divorced from character is unlikely to be an engine of success.
Now, his glowing review of Franchione is — believe it or not — in many ways correct. Say what you will about his departure, but in his time in Tuscaloosa Fran was nothing if not professional in his day-to-day management of the team. He kicked out of a lot of bad seeds, put players back to work in the weight room, was explicit in setting standards that he expected players to meet (on the field, off the field, and in the classroom), and never feigned any reservations whatsoever about booting or benching players who failed to meet those standards (even if those players were the team’s best players). In that regard, Fran was clearly everything you wanted in a football coach.
The praise of Fran, however, should probably stop there. He didn’t recruit well, he arguably put the players in poor schemes, his playcalling was suspect, and he literally was looking to leave Tuscaloosa months after arriving. Keep in mind, though, that when this went to press in 2003, 77-0 had only happened on some kid’s PS2 and the national press was still running rampant with talk of how Fran was the next Bear Bryant. When this book was written, the underlying expectation was that Fran would build a national championship powerhouse in College Station and Alabama fans would spend decades crying in their crimson beer over what could of been. None of that came to fruition, of course, and frankly that is all the more reason to wait on writing the book, really.
And with Stallings, I’ve written about him extensively in the past, and I still contend the Alabama fan base does not have a healthy understanding of his tenure. He did many good things in Tuscaloosa… he inherited a team with a lot of talent, quickly infused discipline, toughness, and a couple of good recruiting classes, and combined he won very big with it his first few years. However, people who like to cast Stallings as a football jesus simply overlook many of his shortcomings. He played a key role in botching the Langham affair, getting us hammered by the NCAA in the short-term and setting us up for the long-term Means disaster. He didn’t recruit like he should have from 1992 on, he failed to seize the momentum of the national championship, he had a lot of in-fighting on his staff, and his out-dated offensive approach became a burden, increasingly so in an era with an increased emphasis on the passing game and the offense in general. He didn’t ultimately stick around to see the worst of it, but he was responsible for some of the decline of Alabama football in the late 1990’s. Dubose deserves the bulk of the blame, mind you, but Stallings should not be absolved of all responsibility and in fact his share of the blame is far from negligible. All in all, the result is a mixed bag. Stallings did some great things, but did some bad things as well, and those who love to deify him must completely ignore the many negative aspects of his tenure in order to do so.
"Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself." -- Milton Friedman
by outsidethesidelines on May 18, 2010 10:59 AM CDT reply actions
Totally agree about
Stallings. We were on top of the football world and he could not sustain the progress he had made. I don’t think any Bama fans felt in 1992 that it would be 17 years and 4 more coaches before we won another NC. In rock star terms he was a “one hit wonder.”
I hate the NCAA more than UT & AU combined. At least with UT & AU you got a fighting chance.
Keep Things In Perspective
I’ve been a Bama fan for 40 years. The fact is Dubose was a truly great Tide player under Bear Bryant. The Bear loved him and his leadership. Dubose was the defensive coordinator for Stallings the year they won the NC, so he has for sure 2 national championship rings. Everyone agrees he was a super assistant. I agree with the article that he was in over his head as a head coach but a lot of junk was there when he took over, not least of which were the slew of meddling alumni and boosters. But…but, he did bring home an SEC championship, To all the Dubose bashers – lighten up. He’s Alabama family. It took a Saban-style of control and leadership to restore the program back to where we all know it should be.
DuBose loved Alabama.
But I give the credit to the 99 championship to a couple of players- Shaun Alexander and Chris Samuels. After losing to La Tech those two just rose up and won the thing inspite of DuBose. The very next year without those two we were 3-8 with roughly the same team and an easier schedule. 3-8 that was DuBose. In 4 seasons, 3 of which he had Shaun Alexander, he was 24-23. (And in those days you got Vandy every year- take out Vandy and DuBose would have been 20-23.)
He deserves much of the blame. And his own ego lead to his down fall.
I hate the NCAA more than UT & AU combined. At least with UT & AU you got a fighting chance.
a while back i explained to to someone like this...
if mike dubose walked into a tuscaloosa bar, he may have to wait awhile but someone would buy him a beer. if franchione walked into that same bar people would be scrambling to find a rail, warm tar and feathers.
Roll 'Bama Roll: The Champagne of 'Bama Blogs.
Either way...
…I think we’ve all learned that — decades from now, when CNS finally retires after winning his 10th national title — we’ve got to stop hiring head coaches named Mike….
"High standards come from passion within...." --Coach Nick Saban
by NiceLittleSaturday on May 18, 2010 10:01 PM CDT up reply actions
We hired him...
…before Saban (kicks self for dissing boyhood hero)….
"High standards come from passion within...." --Coach Nick Saban
by NiceLittleSaturday on May 20, 2010 7:14 PM CDT up reply actions
I've always liked Mike Dubose
he is definitely Alabama through and through………that being said, he was in way over his head as head coach, and more than that he did multiple things to publicly embarrass the university……….and I was under the impression that the defensive coordinator in 1992 was Bill Oliver, and even if Dubose had the title, it was Oliver and Stallings that ran that defense…….
Oliver had the title...
…and did the job…Dubose was DC after Oliver left.
"High standards come from passion within...." --Coach Nick Saban
by NiceLittleSaturday on May 20, 2010 7:13 PM CDT up reply actions
i'm in the jungle right now so i can't give a complete response due to dodgy internet
but i appreciate everyone’s contributions to the discussion. one of the reasons i was so disappointed by this book is because, in many ways, it’s one that really needs to be written.
one thing i’ve come to appreciate in doing the reading room over the past year and going over all the stories of the program’s history is that each and every coach was an incredibly complex and often conflicted individual. moreover, each era tends to defy the simple categorization we’ve been taught to believe by the sports page.
i personally feel that an understanding of the shortcomings of the various individuals involved in these accounts doesn’t erode the importance of their achievements a whit. instead it presents them as very profound characters making tough choices at difficult times. it make them human and that gives us an opportunity to learn from their mistakes and aspire to their successes.
Roll 'Bama Roll: The Champagne of 'Bama Blogs.
Agree
Absolutely fantatstic comment, KLEPH. One of the best ever. You are so right about the fact that the individuals involved were complex people with issues, like all of us. So many fans are simplistic in that they only see the x’s and o’s, and the wins and losses, and don’t even really want to know the real story line that involves thes personalities, the realtionships, all the aspects of the human dynamics of the making of a football team. What it does for me is help me appreciate all the more the magnificent job Saban is doing in terms of creating a “process” and a culture – not in essense a culture of winning, but a culture of excellence, on and off the field, that has as a by-product winning. Some of our recent coaches did not at the time they were coaching Alabama have that level of excellence in their own personal lives. Leading a football team is so much more than just “coaching em up” – look at Spurrier. No one can “coach” better than him, but he apparently cannot build a culture like Saban can, and as a result, had his moments of glory but cannot sustain long-term success.
Dubose can “coach”, but could not build that required culture. And my guess is he has grown and matured to the point he would never be guilty of making the same mistakes again. He bleeds Crimson, and always has. He was not a hired gun. He had a shot and it had very mixed results – but he is still a home boy and rabid fans that can’t see him as a person need to quit being so simple-minded. You reap what you sow. If you want to throw someone to the dogs, well you figure out the rest.
Thanks for a great article and an even better comment.
May I make a suggestion for a new post?
You can call it “judging a book by its cover” and critique which bama book has the best…….wait for it……..cover.
"Sympathy has expired Longhorns" WallaceWade04
by The Voice of Reason on May 19, 2010 8:29 AM CDT reply actions

by 




















