RBR Reading Room: Braggin' Rights

This week, Roll Bama Roll has invited Jerry Hinnen of War Blog Eagle -- by far the best source of information about Auburn football out there on the sports blogosphere -- to review Braggin' Rights, Bill Cromartie's book on the rivalry between The Alabama Crimson Tide and "that cow college on the other side of the state."
Greetings, RBR readers. I'm guessing most you know me by now, thanks to our annual Q&A and my need to pop up and whine incessantly at Todd whenever he has the brazen audacity to vote Central Michigan No. 21 in his BlogPoll ballot instead of Auburn. (How could you, Todd? Honestly.) But both Q&A time and BlogPoll whinging time are months away, of course, so why am I here?
Because the good folks here at RBR thought it might be a nice change of pace to inject some outside perspective into the Reading Room, and since an Auburn perspective wouldn’t be worth much when reviewing, say, Snake (unless you’d enjoy reading "We shoulda won in 1967, damnit, We shoulda won in 1967, damnit" over and over again, "All work and no play"-style, and neither you nor anyone sane would), Kleph asked me to read Bill Cromartie’s book Braggin’ Rights: Alabama vs. Auburn.
The concept of Braggin’ Rights couldn’t possibly be simpler. It’s a year-by-year history of the Iron Bowl, one summary for every game, starting in 1893 and covering all 46 games through 1981. The book (as best I can tell) is out-of-print, and my copy is a second edition, concluding with Bear Bryant’s 315th victory in ’81; a third edition was apparently published in 1994.
I’d particularly recommend that third edition to Auburn fans, since finishing the chronology one year before "Bo Over the Top"—and with the Tide still riding their nine-game streak in the series—is, ahem, a bit of a downer. But I’d nonetheless encourage any fan with an interest in the series’ history, Tide or Tiger, to find a copy if they can.
Because as easy reference material goes, Braggin’ Rights should prove awfully handy. If you’re the sort of fan, like me, who knows that the Snake rambled through the mud at some point in the late ‘60s but doesn’t remember the exact date, the season-long context in which the game was played, or other pertinent details like "why exactly was that game so legendarily painful for Shug Jordan?", the book keeps them all straight for you.
It was 1967; the Tide were ranked No. 8 with a 7-1-1 record, while Auburn sat at 6-3; after three straight losses and back-to-back blowout defeats against Alabama, the Tigers were desperate to avoid sending their seniors out without a win in the Iron Bowl … and then they blew chance after chance inside the 20 to let Stabler’s one big run carry the day.
As with most of the recaps, there’s a rough play-by-play, statistics, postgame quotes, and even some reproduced photographs and headlines from the state’s newspapers. If you need to look up any particular fact about any particular Iron Bowl, it’s here, and the year-by-year organization makes it easy to find.
(Braggin’ Rights would also make excellent bathroom reading material. Each synopsis is just a few pages long, and of course you can read one year, put the book down, and pick up right where you left off.)
That said, it’s hard to recommend Braggin’ Rights as a one-shot, cover-to-cover read. After a while the play-by-play, deluge of statistics, and endless references to elements like the series’ all-time score can start to run together and make for some pretty dry reading. The book’s best section comes in the pre-war, pre-cessation-of-hostilities days, when Cromartie relies heavily on the wonderfully colorful newspaper accounts of the day, like this passage from the Birmingham News’ story on Alabama’s 30-0 win in 1905:
"The team that it was believed would give Alabama a tough fight and play the Crimson and White to a standstill, was crushed and battered by a mass of muscle and educated chain lightning."
Let’s see someone sneak a sentence like that past their J-school instructors these days. My favorite sub-headline, from Auburn’s 1901 win in Tuscaloosa: "THE VISITORS WERE TOO HEAVY." These kinds of nuggets are all over the first third of the book.
But as Cromartie heads towards more modern times he leans more and more on his own descriptions and storytelling, and unfortunately he’s not much of a prose stylist. As mentioned, he can let the facts of each "case" overwhelm the narrative, references to issues outside the Iron Bowl (like Vietnam war protests or, weirdly, the Birmingham World Football League team from the ‘70s) feel painfully forced, and there’s always a stylistic awkwardness that reminds you you’re reading something written in the late ‘70s/early ‘80s. His portrayal of a pivotal play in the ’81 encounter:
"Late in the first quarter, Auburn quarterback Joe Sullivan (brother of Heisman Trophy winner Pat) completed a 31-yard pass to Ed West to Alabama’s 19. Driving on down to the eight, where it was first-and-goal, Coach Dye, shuffling three quarterbacks in and out of the game, now had freshman Ken Hobby at the controls. On first down, Hobby threw an ill-advised pass into the endzone. It was intercepted by Tommy Wilcox. ‘Drat! Drat! Drat!’ screamed Auburn fans."
Call me crazy, but I don’t think that even in 1981, Auburn fans were screaming "Drat! Drat! Drat!" after that play. But the passage still illustrates why the book is so intriguing; who knew that an allegedly staid coach like Dye would play three different quarterbacks, one a freshman, in the biggest game of the year? The older generation of fans who remember the game itself, yes, of course … but not me, that’s for sure.
So if reading Braggin’ Rights start-to-finish over a few days became a bit of a slog at times, it still managed to make an impression, an impression that might best be distilled down to: this series is important. The newspapers of the day make it clear that the Iron Bowl was the single biggest event on the state’s sports calendars as soon as the two schools agreed to play, and between the Alabama legislature’s attempts to broker a deal during the cessation, the endless sellouts at Legion Field, the larger-than-life status of the Bear and Shug, that’s never changed.
But it’s easy to forget, now that we’re almost 16 years removed from the 1994 clash-of-undefeateds, how critical the Iron Bowl regularly was on both the national and conference scene. Total up the two teams’ records heading into the season finale in 1971, ’72, and ’74, and you get a mark of 56-2. ("Punt Bama Punt," as the majority of you here no doubt recall, was the Tide’s only regular season loss in that four-season span.)
There was some pooh-poohing of the Iron Bowl’s importance from both sides in the final days of Tubby’s streak (as Auburn fans pretended to be bored with victories over Alabama in an effort to get under the skin of Alabama fans, and Alabama fans pretended the rivalry meant little to them in an effort to assert their superiority even when their team couldn’t manage it on the field … as I’ve written a few times, we all have our jobs to do), but I imagine that kind of chatter will stop if both teams can finally return themselves to national prominence at the same time. And as the historical precedent so painstakingly illustrated by Braggin’ Rights shows, there’s no reason they can’t.
That’s the way both of the Iron Bowl’s legendary coaches would have wanted it, anyway. Cromartie had Jordan and Bryant each write a brief foreword for the book’s first edition, and this is the way Bear’s ends:
"It is a good clean series that is important to the State of Alabama. And I’m sure that to Auburn people it is the biggest game of the year, just like it is to Alabama people. May that never change."
Speaking for one Auburn fan, at least, it hasn’t. I’ve always believed that Auburn vs. Alabama was the greatest rivalry in college football, arguably the greatest rivalry in college sports, and deserved mention among the greatest rivalries in all of American sports. Braggin’ Rights did nothing to change that opinion.
Jerry Hinnen covers Auburn football at War Blog Eagle (formerly The Joe Cribbs Car Wash) because somebody has to. He is also an occasional contributor to the SB Nation SEC blog, Team Speed Kills.
Next week: Crimson Tide Madness
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice write-up, J...
…but you know that Central Michigan vote was spot-on…. Seriously, this is a good book to own if you’re a fan of either team, and so much better than Bragging Rights or War In Dixie. Thanks for playing.
"High standards come from passion within...." --Coach Nick Saban
by NiceLittleSaturday on May 25, 2010 8:35 AM CDT reply actions
War in Dixie wasn't very good, in my opinion...
… a lot of that had to do with the fact that they probably picked one of the worst years possible to profile the Iron Bowl — you pick 1994 or 2005 and that book is MUCH better — but even so I didn’t think the author really accurately portrayed either side very well. It had a lot of potential, but all in all I found it to be rather disappointing.
I’ve read Braggin’ Rights before, and it’s solid, but as Jerry mentioned the fragmented nature of the book makes it difficult to be a cover-to-cover read.
"Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself." -- Milton Friedman
by outsidethesidelines on May 25, 2010 8:47 AM CDT up reply actions
There needs to be a book
that covers all the shit we do outside of the game…
hell, outside of the FOOTBALL SEASON
that’s what makes Iron Bowl the bat shit craziest rivalry in America
oh and nice write up barner…
My body is a temple
New helmets needed...

"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
Just kiddin' .... Now this one..

With a script “A” in place of the numeral
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
It appears that all SEC teams....
had numbers on the side of their helmets until the 60’s and early 70’s. Alabama is the only one left to progress.
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
We would prefer to stay that way.
Auburn and Tennessee fans are a lot like Slinkys...neither are worth much but you do get a sense of satisfaction from pushing them down a flight of stairs
Let's put it to a vote...
Change to a more modern logo like the baseball and softball team with the script A or leave it along and let the rest of the nation think, “They’re so dumb in the south that they need their number on the side of their helmets so they can keep up with it.”
No disrespect, I have crimson blood cousring thru my viens, but the 60’s style helmets and “Rammer Jammer” need to go…
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
can’t believe what I just read…
Roll Bama Roll - The Champagne of Bama Blogs.
if you actually believe this is some sort of a democracy
i’m not sure i can really address your concerns in any adequate manner.
Roll 'Bama Roll: The Champagne of 'Bama Blogs.
One article I read said...
A changing of helmet or uniform design reflected a coaching change and a new direction.
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
"They’re so dumb in the south that they need their number on the side of their helmets so they can keep up with it."
A) Since when did we care what anyone else thought?
B) Is every other team so dumb that they need their logo on the side of their helmets to remember what team they’re on?
C) May your idea never, never, never happen.
That is all.
"Let's go be champions, boys!" - Greg McElroy
(Formerly SugarBowl93)
by RememberTheRoseBowl on May 25, 2010 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions
I respect everybody's opinions....
It’s just a thought I had. I would love to take away the network’s ability to manipulate the university by picking any random number to display, that’s all.
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
The TV broadcasts up through this past season
usually always showed a #12, which I assumed the University had some hand in since it would represent 12 NCs.
I see low numbers...
as offensive strength and high numbers as defensive.
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
If the rest of the country started making their players
wear their helmets backwards, should we?
You honestly think you would have any chance in such a poll?? My prediction is that it would be 98% to keep the numbers, 1% to change, and 1% “WTF?”
That helmet...
…gets an ‘F’….
"High standards come from passion within...." --Coach Nick Saban
by NiceLittleSaturday on May 25, 2010 3:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Dude.....
some kid has stolen your password and is writing the craziest stuff using your name.
That white stuff on the top of chickencrap is.....chickencrap.
"Dude" is a default
I usually go to when I am about to make a wise crack. I mean no disrespect. Hope you didn’t take it that way.
That white stuff on the top of chickencrap is.....chickencrap.
None taken.....
I didn’t care for Cliff’s Kleph’s tenor of his reply post below. Like I’m some kind of troll. I’ve enjoyed RBR’s back and forth banter, but get really pissed when I see post of a condescending nature.
Apparently I stepped on his journalistic nerve….
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
Exhibit 1A
of the failures of democracy…
"Hush now, let it go now. I know it's time to go. Time to let this fall from my hands" VNV Nation, "From My Hands"
by Stuck in the Plains on May 26, 2010 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions
(And for most teams it might have 1 numbered helmet for 1 or 2 years in the ’60s, but most are logos.)
i think it's a technology issue...
doing the historical pieces last year i noticed that the number on the helmet was pretty common back in the sixties. (it was usually that or nothing at all) i’m assuming that’s because when the modern helmets were introduced there was only a limited means of adorning them with designs.
as you get into the 70s the more modern logos get started but, as you obviously remember, that’s the middle of the bryant era. and change wasn’t something he allowed a hell of a lot of without a good reason. now i’m not saying i’ve ever seen anywhere that coach bryant opposed it but i’m damn sure it wouldn’t have happened without his approval.
still, it’s an interesting topic for investigation.
Roll 'Bama Roll: The Champagne of 'Bama Blogs.
i’m assuming that’s because when the modern helmets were introduced there was only a limited means of adorning them with designs.
With the early modern helmets, it was a massive chore just to keep them painted and to get the paint color to show up looking halfway decent. Intricate designs were out of the question.
"Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of belief in freedom itself." -- Milton Friedman
by outsidethesidelines on May 25, 2010 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Do you remember Ingram's....
helmet with one of his "2"’s coming off??
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
Yeah, I assumed it was, but
I’m guessing that a lot of schools just had generic helmets rather than numbers way back in the day.
All logoed helmets....
have the player’s number in the center of the back of the helmet.
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
Is that a rule?
If not, I’m doubting that’s true in ALL cases. Besides, I was talking about pre-1960. My guess is that more schools had “blank” helmets rather than numbers.
research shows...
all SEC teams had numbers pre-early 70’s.
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
What research??
Again, do you have a link? This is all I can find:
http://www.nationalchamps.net/Helmet_Project/sec.htm
Check UGa, MSU, SC, and UT.
You got me on Georgia's...
but that’s it.
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
MSU had numbers for a grand total of 3 years.
SC for 2 years. And UT for 2 years.
And that site doesn’t generally show anything before 1960.
And Bama started in 1957....
which is the same year as the barners NC. A strange twist on Florida’s funky “F”.
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
True about the Bryant era...
but he also wanted eligible receivers wear a white helmet to stand out from the other crimson ones. That wouldn’t fly today.
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
dude, seriously
take it somewhere else. noone agrees with you and this is supposed to be comments about jerry’s review.
Roll 'Bama Roll: The Champagne of 'Bama Blogs.
Sorry Kleph for derailng your post...
but thanks for the heads up to know you can’t voice an opinion here. For someone I thought of as a friend on RBR, boy was I fooled, and the name’s not dude.
Sad day…………….
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
Is the name really skycaster?
Seriously, all he’s saying is that, if you really want to continue this, take it somewhere else…like the fanposts (or fanshots if need be) because “this is supposed to be comments about jerry’s review.” Get it?
"High standards come from passion within...." --Coach Nick Saban
by NiceLittleSaturday on May 25, 2010 8:01 PM CDT up reply actions
It wasn't meant to get so much response.....
but the post revved up to a fever pitch and dialog ensued. It got the feeling of an open thread, like gameday…… damn, will this off-season ever end?
As far as my screen name, I’ve had it for some twenty years as my original email address. I tried to come up with something unique and fitting, so skycaster was born ( information casted across the sky, the internet ). I also like to fish.
Enough of this, back to jerry’s review….
"We all look at it not so much as a rebuilding year, but more as a reloading year.." - Greg McElroy
Good write up...
…if most of the AU fans I ran into were more like you, I wouldn’t have my current tagline.
Auburn and Tennessee fans are a lot like Slinkys...neither are worth much but you do get a sense of satisfaction from pushing them down a flight of stairs
I love your avatar.
Buster FTW!
Great review as well.
I am not superstitious, but I'm a little 'stitious.-Michael Scott

by 





















