Week 6 Sagarin Rankings (with projections)

It's like Kwanzaa, Boxing Day, Ash Wednesday all rolled into one. That's right, people: Sagarin rankings are now well-connected!

(Essentially, that means enough teams have played each other that the model doesn't have to take preseason rankings into account anymore.)

What does that mean?

Well, for the SEC, very little changes (other than the results on the field, obviously):


Alabama 101.07
South Carolina 92.24
Texas A&M 91.2
Florida 91.12
LSU 87.49
Georgia 82.99
Mississippi State 79.05
Missouri 75.87
Ole Miss 74.39
Tennessee 74.25
Auburn 71.44
Arkansas 71.08
Vanderbilt 70.7
Kentucky 64.24

Resulting in the following projected season:


Alabama 8-0
Texas A&M 6-2
Mississippi State 5-3
LSU 4-4
Ole Miss 3-5
Arkansas 2-6
Auburn 0-8


Florida 8-0
South Carolina 7-1
Georgia 6-2
Tennessee 3-5
Vanderbilt 3-5
Missouri 1-7
Kentucky 0-8

SEC CHAMPIONSHIP: Alabama (-10) over Florida

Some other fun results:

ACC CHAMP: Florida State (11-2, BCS bound but out of the title picture)

BIG EAST CHAMP: Cincinnati (12-0, OOC win over VT no longer impressive)

BIG TEN CHAMP: Nebraska (11-2, see FSU; Ohio State ends up 12-0 but not postseason-eligible)

BIG 12 CHAMP: Kansas State (11-1, no marquee OOC win, but the computers loves the Big 12 this year) (N.B. - Sagarin still thinks West Virginia is going to drop at least 3 this year. I'm not sold.)

PAC 12 CHAMP: Oregon (13-0, dominant in conference play but flimsy OCC schedule) (N.B. - Sagarin has Stanford, USC, and ASU all with 3 losses before the PAC 12 championship.)

INDEPENDENTS: Notre Dame (12-0, with wins over MSU, Mich, Stanford, Oklahoma, and USC)

So, who would you send to Miami? Well, in the ELO_CHESS rankings (which is the part of Sagarin that the BCS uses), the postseason-eligible teams projected to be undefeated or one-loss are ranked thusly:

  1. Alabama (currently #1, games against #9, #18 and #20 remaining)
  2. Florida (currently #2, projected to lose SECCG)
  3. Notre Dame (currently #5, games against #10, #11, and #15 remaining)
  4. Oregon (currently #6, games against #10, #11, #12, and #22)
  5. Kansas State (currently #7, one loss projected)
  6. Rutgers (currently #16, one loss projected, stuck in the Big East)
  7. Boise State (currently #17, one loss, no more losses projected)
  8. Cincinnati (currently #19, stuck in the Big East)
  9. Louisiana Tech (currently #27, one loss projected)
  10. Tulsa (currently #50, one loss, no more losses projected)

Which makes for an interesting BCS scenario...

BCS NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME: Alabama (-9) over Notre Dame

ROSE BOWL: Oregon (-10) over Nebraska

SUGAR BOWL: Florida (at-large, 1-loss SEC runner-up) (-3) over Texas (at-large, best 2-loss team available)

FIESTA BOWL: Kansas State (-2) over Boise State (at-large, best 1-loss team available)

ORANGE BOWL: Florida State (-8) over Cincinnati

Rutgers might leapfrog Texas and/or Boise State in the computers by the end of the year, but I don't think the voters would put two Big East teams in BCS bowls.

So, where is Sagarin full of it?

FanPosts are just that; posts created by the fans. They are in no way indicative of the opinions of SBN and the authors of Roll Bama Roll.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Roll 'Bama Roll

You must be a member of Roll 'Bama Roll to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Roll 'Bama Roll. You should read them.

Join Roll 'Bama Roll

You must be a member of Roll 'Bama Roll to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Roll 'Bama Roll. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.