Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

NCAA Committee Recommends Special Teams Changes

Anything that results in less of this is a good thing.

The NCAA Football Rules Committee proposed a number of rule changes today, one of which could have a major impact on special teams. Per a press release from the NCAA, the basic outline of the proposal follows below:

Kickoff and Touchback Starting Lines Moved. The committee voted to move the kickoff to the 35-yard line (currently set at the 30-yard line), and to require that kicking team players must be no further than five yards from the 35 at the kick, which is intended to limit the running start kicking teams have during the play. The committee also voted to move the touchback distance on free kicks to the 25-yard line instead of the 20-yard line to encourage more touchbacks. NCAA data indicates injuries during kickoffs occur more often than in other phases of the game.

This proposal is ultimately a safety measure more than anything else. Kickoff returns are widely considered the single most dangerous play in all of football, and by having more of these plays result in uncontested touchbacks than trainwreck type collisions between twenty-two players, the idea is that the game will be safer for all involved. Moving the kickoff line up will result in more touchbacks, and moving the ball further down the field following a touchback will give return units a greater incentive to kneel on the ball in the end zone instead of bringing it out, so the thinking here is that the rule changes on both ends will work to limit the overall number of returns.

Many have jumped off the deep end since the news of this broke, with some claiming it would end special teams as we know it. That may be a bit of hyperbole -- placekicking and punting remain the same, and returns and out-of-bounds kicks would occur, even if less frequently -- though admittedly it would be a big change. This isn't exactly Greg Schiano's suggestion of eliminating kickoffs entirely, but it does move the rules in that direction.

Safety issues notwithstanding, for Alabama this would be a welcomed change. 'Bama has fared well enough on kickoff returns, but kickoff return defense has often featured breakdown after breakdown and lack of distance in kickoffs has been a major problem for many years now and on net 'Bama would gain with just about any rule change that reduces the importance of special teams. Raw improvement would be nice, but for the time being I'll take Bill Polian's old strategy: Why worry about getting better when you can just get the rules changed instead?

Having said that, though, don't take this one as a panacea just yet. Last year Cade Foster kicked off 81 times and only recorded five touchbacks with an average kickoff length of just 63.3 yards. In other words, barring improvement from Foster or a much better showing by Adam Griffith, 'Bama will still find touchbacks few and far between next season and will still be forced to effectively cover kicks on a consistent basis.

In any event, all rule change proposals must still be approved by the Playing Rules Oversight Panel, and member schools will be able to comment on the proposals before any of the changes are put in effect.

Comment 38 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This is not unexpected

Safety is paramount and this is a step in the right direction for the college game.

by ApothecaryMark on Feb 9, 2012 6:42 PM CST reply actions  

Totally agree

I’m all behind any reasonable safety measure. Ultimately it has to be equipment, but smart little rule changes can help in the meanwhile.

by glen55 on Feb 10, 2012 1:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Loss of Helmet

will have a major impact


Loss of Helmet During Play. If a player loses his helmet (other than as the result of a foul by the opponent, like a facemask), it will be treated like an injury. The player must leave the game and is not allowed to participate for the next play. Current injury timeout rules guard against using this rule to gain an advantage from stopping the clock. Additionally, if a player loses his helmet, he must not continue to participate in play to protect him from injury. Data collected during the 2011 season indicated that helmets came off of players more than two times per game.

by Talabama on Feb 9, 2012 7:27 PM CST reply actions  

I'm more concerned with...

the blatant HOLDING!

j/k

"It's not the size of the cat in the fight, it's size of the fight in the cat"

"Pep talks... only work when they touch that ember of truth learned the hardest possible way on the field.-Kleph

by thecalicocat on Feb 10, 2012 6:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Awesome Picture!

That has to be one of the greatest photos ever of a Crimson Tide player, makes me so proud every time I see it!

by bornbama1 on Feb 10, 2012 7:47 AM CST up reply actions  

I'd be interested to know of the two times per game the helmet came off

how many of those players ended up with a concussion?

You’d think it happens all the time but I can never remember a guy without a helmet being injured.

Maybe helmets are the cause of injury.

If Auburn was in New Mexico and we never played them I would still hate them and their dumb coach and their cheating players.

by 5026 on Feb 9, 2012 7:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Sort of.

You certainly keep your head up when you don’t have a helmet on.

'There are two pains in life. There is the pain of discipline and the pain of disappointment. If you can handle the pain of discipline, then you'll never have to deal with the pain of disappointment,'- Nick Saban

by J Tadpole on Feb 9, 2012 8:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Am I reading this right?

Is the injury timeout rule goin to apply to helmets? Meaning that if a player loses his helmet in the final two minutes the team has to call a timeout or have a ten second runoff? I’m sure that will go over well the first time a team loses a game because their center lost his helmet blocking when they were out of timeouts and driving.

by rugman11 on Feb 9, 2012 8:51 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Get ready for politically correct football.

By the way, one way to prevent injuries is to award a single point to the other team anytime someone hits someone hard.

Tackles should be soft and gentle sort of like helping a friend to find a seat at a picnic.

Blocking should look like two people doing the waltz.

If Auburn was in New Mexico and we never played them I would still hate them and their dumb coach and their cheating players.

by 5026 on Feb 9, 2012 9:19 PM CST up reply actions  

From the Big 12, are you?

"The same things win today that have always won, and they will win years from now. The only difference is the losers have a whole new bunch of excuses why they don’t win or can’t win."-Bear Bryant

(12-4)+2=12 hoping for a +1

Robot Chicken Star Wars should be canon.

by the thin red line on Feb 10, 2012 12:44 AM CST up reply actions  

And it will happen, too

Helmets coming off ain’t a rare thing.

by glen55 on Feb 10, 2012 1:29 AM CST up reply actions  

I am fully in favor of this rule.

I have a good suspicion that many of the helmets that come off during the game are due to 1 of 2 reasons:
1) ill fitting helmets
2) chin straps not buckled.

This will give the players incentive to get helmets that fit correctly (more so than comfortably) and to put them on correctly. These 2 measures should reduce concussions.
And on the occasion that a properly fit and equipped helmet does come off, it won’t be that big of a deal.

I believe that there are already rules in place to prevent forcably removing someone’s helmet. I know that a facemask can be called when any portion of the helmet is grabbed. (I saw a facemask called when someone grabbed the earhole). There is the potential that we could see more of this – trying to remove a helmet to get someone out of the game for a play. But I’d say this would be an improvement over going after someone’s knees which already happens.

This is an excellent rule change in my opinion.

by The keeper on Feb 10, 2012 8:03 AM CST up reply actions  

Head full of hair, dreads...

Shave that shit off!!

"There's a lot of blood, sweat, and guts between dreams and success." -Coach Bear Bryant
"I thInk everybody should take the attItude that we’re workIng to be a champIon, that we want to be a champIon In everythIng that we do. every choIce, every decIsIon, everythIng that we do every day, we want to be a champIon."
-- Nick SabaN

by Tokeisch on Feb 10, 2012 4:25 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Wouldn't you know it...

we finally get a guy (Griffith) who can put the ball in the end zone consistently and then they change the rule.

I think they ought to change the out of bounds rule on kick-offs to let the ball stay where it goes out. This would encourage more kickers to attempt to kick it out at the 5. Also, since more kicks would head toward out of bounds, more returns would be along the sideline which to me seems safer since often the guy is simply forced out of bounds rather than in the middle of field where he is lit up.

Since our D is going to allow very few points going forward we will not be that effected by the move in kick-off when we are returning as often we only get to return 1 kick per game (see LSU.)

If Auburn was in New Mexico and we never played them I would still hate them and their dumb coach and their cheating players.

by 5026 on Feb 9, 2012 7:40 PM CST reply actions  

Griffith

I thought the same thing. But, then we all thought the same thing about foster. So, who knows. I do disagree about kicking it to the sideline. You shouldn’t be able to avoid a great return man by kicking it out of bounds. As a whole, this rule won’t affect game play much. It might save a few redshirts though. The kick coverage won’t need to be as tight with more touchbacks.

by RexBama13 on Feb 9, 2012 11:52 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

This sucks.

This eliminates an entire phase of the game… It is football not t-ball.

What the hell is an aluminum falcon?

by gibbygoat on Feb 10, 2012 12:07 AM CST reply actions  

Vinnie Sunseri does not approve of this rule

And yes he realizes he sustained a concussion on a kick-off this year at MSU. He still does not approve of this rule.

"If wanting to win is a fault, as some of my critics seem to insist, then I plead guilty. I like to win. I know no other way. It's in my blood." -- Paul "Bear" Bryant

by GeauxCrimson on Feb 10, 2012 7:49 AM CST reply actions  

It was a lot of fun watching Vinnie

just obliterate return guys. However, as he will likely be starting next year he may not be on ST anyway. I would keep him off
ST to avoid injury.

I do think that Cade Foster has a future at Bama not as kick off guy, that will be Griffith, but as a part of kick coverage. Cade is pretty good in the open field bringing down return men of course he has had a lot of practice.

If Auburn was in New Mexico and we never played them I would still hate them and their dumb coach and their cheating players.

by 5026 on Feb 10, 2012 1:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Funny you should mention these guys....

take a look at my list of suggested rule changes I posted on BOL

In response to the new safety rules proposed by the NCAA rules committee, some of Bama’s opponents have submitted the following suggestions:

1. Yellow “non-contact” jerseys for opposing QBs
2. Bama’s LBs have to suit up in the big foam Sumo wrestling suits.
3. Bama is allowed 11 defenders, but 2 of them have to assist the offense by tackling Jesse Williams
4. Saban’s pre-game speech is limited to 3 seconds. Must observe monk-like silence at half.
5. Replace Scott Cochran with emotionless pod person.
6. Cade Foster, Vinnie Sunseri, Trey DePriest, and HaHa aren’t allowed to tackle on kick-offs
7. Opposing team allowed 6 “Peremptory” Challenges to remove Bama players from the game. Any coach that Saban has made quit gets 12 challenges.
8. Bama gymnast or Big Al must play nose tackle.

When asked about these rules changes, Saban was quoted as saying “I really don’t care about all that sh” (Saban wasn’t allowed to complete his comment due to rule #4)

RTR! :)

by BamaBR549 on Feb 11, 2012 9:32 AM CST up reply actions  

The implementation of both KO measures may change strategy...

If you just move the KO up, and still make the touchback come out to the 20 yd line, then there will be more touchbacks. However, if you bring the touchback out to the 25, there may be a place for high, accurate kick-offs that are more like punts. The idea being that if you can get your coverage down there in time (which is 5 yards closer now) that you’ll be more likely to stop them before the 25 yard line. Fair catching kickoffs FTW!!

by CrimsonCoast on Feb 10, 2012 7:50 AM CST reply actions  

Bingo

This is exactly what happened in the pros this year. If your kickoff guy has leg and that’s about it, stick it in the end zone. But if he has more control than that, stick some of them in the end zone and go for hangtime on the others—to sucker the returner out. And the pros didn’t move the touchback to the 25. With that change, it makes it even more important. It becomes one giant game of chicken. Whether 22 guys playing chicken leads to more or less safety only time will tell.

by Steven Mitchell on Feb 10, 2012 8:21 AM CST up reply actions  

So to recap

If it’s huge but you can’t really control it, it goes straight into the end zone. However, if it’s not as big but you have a lot of control, then you get creative with your tactics and go for some extra time.

I completely understand.

'There are two pains in life. There is the pain of discipline and the pain of disappointment. If you can handle the pain of discipline, then you'll never have to deal with the pain of disappointment,'- Nick Saban

by J Tadpole on Feb 10, 2012 10:49 AM CST up reply actions  

If we're lucky.

'There are two pains in life. There is the pain of discipline and the pain of disappointment. If you can handle the pain of discipline, then you'll never have to deal with the pain of disappointment,'- Nick Saban

by J Tadpole on Feb 10, 2012 12:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Guess I should be grateful

that you kept the chickens out of that.

by Steven Mitchell on Feb 10, 2012 1:01 PM CST up reply actions  

TWSS

'There are two pains in life. There is the pain of discipline and the pain of disappointment. If you can handle the pain of discipline, then you'll never have to deal with the pain of disappointment,'- Nick Saban

by J Tadpole on Feb 10, 2012 1:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Eh?

"There's a lot of blood, sweat, and guts between dreams and success." -Coach Bear Bryant
"I thInk everybody should take the attItude that we’re workIng to be a champIon, that we want to be a champIon In everythIng that we do. every choIce, every decIsIon, everythIng that we do every day, we want to be a champIon."
-- Nick SabaN

by Tokeisch on Feb 10, 2012 4:27 PM CST via mobile up reply actions  

Nice platitude.

However,football is disciplined violence.This just seems like ‘’Robbing Peter to pay Paul’‘grandstanding.That being said,’‘looks like them cheatin bammers are just gettin a rule chainge to help thur spacial tames’’.

RBR resident Dogcaller.

by Crimsoncaller on Feb 10, 2012 12:31 PM CST reply actions  

PAAWWWWLLL!!!1

"14 is important mainly because now it makes 15 within reach."-5026

by UtahBammer on Feb 10, 2012 12:40 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

I have another question:
Additionally, if a player loses his helmet, he must not continue to participate in play to protect him from injury.

Is there some kind of penalty attached to this? Will a player get flagged for continuing to play after losing his helmet?

by rugman11 on Feb 10, 2012 4:00 PM CST reply actions  

He will be sent to the penalty box for 5 mintues

If Auburn was in New Mexico and we never played them I would still hate them and their dumb coach and their cheating players.

by 5026 on Feb 10, 2012 9:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Penalty will be....

Having to play without a helmet for the rest of the game. :)

by BamaBR549 on Feb 11, 2012 9:34 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog covering the Alabama Crimson Tide.

FanPosts

Roll Bama Roll on Twitter


Managers

Disreputable_small Todd

Miltonf-788904_small outsidethesidelines

Kyp2_small Nico2.0

Editors

Kleph_logo_copy_small kleph

Green_small Matt Dover