Over/Under On The 2013 Alabama Defense

Matthew Emmons-USA TODAY Sports

Roll 'Bama Roll takes a slightly different approach at predicting the success of the 2013 season.

Two weeks ago I looked at the 2012 offensive stats and using those same numbers, predicted the Over/Under on the 2013 offense. In the end, some not so outlandish but possibly bold predictions were made. Today, we will do the same for the defense and see if any real prognostications can be made for a 2013 unit that has to replace it's top corner, safety, nose tackle and role players at linebacker and defensive line.

Over/ Under On the 2013 Alabama Defense

Rushing D

Games

Carries

Net

Avg Per Carry

TDs

Yards per

game

1st

14

440

1069

2.43

10

76.36

Average Yards Per Carry: Over

TD's: Under

Yards Per Game: Over

Explanation: 'Bama allowed 2.43 yards per carry in both 2011 and 2012 but in 2010 you'll notice that number rises to 3.29 (which would have been good for 10th last year nationally.)

I just don't see the 2013 defense being as dominant up the middle as the last two seasons and falls somewhere in the middle between 2.43 and 3.29.

Same goes for yards per game. However, I feel we'll actually allow less total rushing TD's. Why? Well, oddly enough only two defenses during the Saban era have allowed more than 6 rushing TD's. 2012 (10) and 2007 (14).

Passing D

Pass

comp

Int

Int %

Yards per

att

TDs

Yards per Game

7th

217

18

4.53

6.12

8

173.64

Interceptions: Push

Yards per attempt: Under

Touchdowns: Over

Yards Per Game: Under

Explanation: If you were to ask any random 'Bama fan where the 2012 defense struggled the most, the answer you'd receive would most undoubtedly be our pass defense. However, the numbers just don't prove that to be the case. Sure, if you compare 2012 to the ridiculous 4.3 yards per attempt set in 2011, 6.12 is struggling. But if you remove 2011, and look at 'Bama defenses historically under Saban, somewhere in the high 5's is much more reasonable.

Yes, last year the defense struggled at times in the passing game but given the talent that returns in 2013, this unit has a chance to improve on that number.

Pass Efficiency D

Pass Att

Pass

comp

Completion

Percent

Yards Per Att

TD %

Rating

7th

397

217

54.66 %

6.12

2.02

103.72

Completion Percent: Push

Rating: Under

Explanation: This one was tough for me to pick because historically QB ratings under Saban have been a tad inconsistent (103, 83, 103, 87, 106, 117). I picked the Under here because again I believe this years pass defense to improve.

And again, outside of the silliness in 2011 2009 (46%) Bama has averaged somewhere in the low to mid 50's for completion percentage. I think if they duplicate that in 2013, we are likely celebrating #16 this time next year.

Total D

Plays

Yards

Avg

TDs

Yards per

game

1st

837

3500

4.18

20

250.00

Total Yards Against: Over

Average per play: Push

Yards Per Game: Push

Explanation: Have you looked at averages for Saban defenses lately? Taking out 2011 (the best) and 2007 (the worst) Bama has averaged 3586 in total yards against, 4.3 yards per play and 261 yards per game. Do you see them bucking this trend? I don't.

If we continue to be "average" I think we'll all be pretty dang happy come January. Also, I feel SEC offenses will most likely improve from 2012. Arkansas, Tennessee, Auburn can't all get worse, can they? Add to that an improved Ole Miss and it'll be much harder for our defense to improve all that much from 2012.

Scoring D

TDs

FG

Points

Points Per Game

1st

20

5

153

10.93

Touchdowns: Over

Field Goals: Over

Total Points: Over

Points Per Game: Over

Explanation: See my reasoning above in that SEC offenses will improve in 2013 as to why our scoring D will take a slight dip. Honestly, I don't see it changing all that much. 11-13 points per game seems about right.

Tackles For Loss

Solo

Assisted

Yards

Total

Per Game

46th

68

36

355

86.0

6.14

Total TFL: OVER

Per Game: OVER

Explanation: CAPS LOCK EMPHASIS MINE. Look, I know we love to say Bama likes to "Affect the Quarterback" (see sacks below) but we need to get MOAR tackles for loss in 2013 and I think with this group that indeed is a possibility.

86 isn't necessarily a low number but I wouldn't say we should aim for it either. Always strive to be better, right? Just for reference sake, Stanford had 124 TFL's last season. Now THAT's a number we should tackle, amiright?

Sacks

Total

Yds

Per Game

28th

35

207

2.5

Total: OVER

Per Game: OVER

Imagine an Alabama defense that not only "affects the quarterback" but also puts him on his ass as well. Again, for reference sake, 35 is the most sacks in a single season for a Saban led Alabama defense. Thirty. Five. Even the infamous 2011 defense only had 30 sacks.

Can we do better in 2013? I believe so. Pagan, Stinson, Hubbard, CJ et al seem better fit to rush the passer. Add Duval and Anderson and we'll hopefully see more sacks in 2013.

3rd Down D

3rd-down Attempts

3rd-down Conversions

Percentage

13th

190

61

32.11

Percentage: Under

Explanation: If you were to ask Coach Saban where the 2012 defense struggled the most, his answer would probably be in 3rd Down defense. If you look back at the Alabama's two worst defensive performances from 2012, you'll see exactly what he'd (possibly) be referencing. -. (LSU 50% and A&M 61% respectfully)

If you remember correctly even Ole Miss had a near 50% conversion rate on 3rd down (8 for 17). And just so you know, the worst defense on 3rd down in 2012 was Kentucky's 52.3%. In my opinion, if you wanna know how good this defense will be in 2013, pay attention to how they perform on 3rd down against Va Tech and A&M.

Red-zone D

Drives

Scores

Points

Rush TD

Pass TD

FG

Percent

T-4th

29

19

120

10

6

3

.66

Percent: Push

Explanation: In 2011 it seemed as if no one could score on that defense (they only gave up 10 pts a game) let alone in the red-zone (an insane 58%). The #1 team in 2012 was Utah St. at 64%.

I believe the 2013 defense will maintain 66% (+/- 2 %) which would put it right around the average of 2012, 2010 and 2009. Not bad company, right?

TL;DR Summary

At this point, what logical conclusion can be made other than that the 2013 defense will be just as good, if not better, than its predecessors? History tells us that at the very least they'll maintain the current level of success. I do believe this years D will look different than what we're use to seeing. We'll be slightly smaller up front and will be quicker at the point of attack. This change is largely out of necessity due to the growing number of HUNH offenses in the SEC.

Like it or not, the speed of the game is only going to get faster and in the end, Saban must adapt with the times much like SEC defenses had to adjust to Spurrier's offense in the 90's. Our defensive philosophies won't change and our coaching staff has proven over and over again that they constantly look at OUR teams weaknesses and proactively look for ways to stay ahead of the curve.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Roll 'Bama Roll

You must be a member of Roll 'Bama Roll to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Roll 'Bama Roll. You should read them.

Join Roll 'Bama Roll

You must be a member of Roll 'Bama Roll to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Roll 'Bama Roll. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker