Roll 'Bama Roll: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


A Modest Proposal on Out of Conference Scheduling

Without fail, one of the predominant topics in the college football off-season every year is out of conference scheduling.

The House Rock Built took the "SEC is a bunch of regionalists approach" and rounded the post out with a neat little table that admittedly omits some data that I think should've been included (trips to North Carolina, Texas and Hawaii), but that's beside the point. EDSBS, of course, has a retort.

A Burnt Orange Nation reader compiled a wish list of five non-conference teams he'd like to see Texas have a home and away series with. Kyle at Dawgsports followed suit with a list of his own for Georgia. Paul Westerdawg of Georgia Sports chimed in with his dream list and I submitted one myself on my pre-Roll Bama Roll blog.

I thoroughly enjoyed reading the "dream lists" for home and away series, but it got me to thinking that even though I'd like to see Alabama take on four massive out of conference opponents in one year that it's a totally unrealistic proposition. I know the others weren't suggesting four big OOC games in a year, that's just my misguided dream. Anyway, virtually every BCS conference team has at least one cupcake on their OOCschedule and some of them have 2 or 3 or 4.

So, while I'd like to see us take on Ohio State, USC, Texas and Miami in addition to our eight conference games, it's totally impractical (actually, in 1977, Alabama had Nebraska, Miami, USC and Louisville as OOC opponents and still managed a 9-1 regular season record and then proceeded to destroy Ohio State 35-6 in the Sugar Bowl.)


I don't know a single college football fan that didn't watch this game.

As it currently stands, we have four out of conference games and here's a semi-realistic proposal of what I'd like to see done with them:

  • One truly marquee opponent every year that'll require a home and away series. It seems as if the massive match-ups of late like USC vs. Notre Dame, Texas vs. Ohio State, etc. help a team with national recruiting no matter if they win or lose, so I'd like to see us throw our hat in the ring again.
  • Two respectable opponents. Either upper echelon mid-major teams or mid to lower level BCS conference opponents that you may or may not choose to have a home and away with. Basically, I'm suggesting decent teams (at least one of them should got to bowl games semi-frequently.)
  • One Division I cupcake. The NCAA should ban D1 teams playing anything lower (at least in football.)

Alabama's out of conference schedule this year is far from stellar, but it meets a good portion of my realistic wish list:

  1. Hawaii (four bowl appearances in the last decade)
  2. Louisiana-Monroe (cupcake)
  3. Duke (lower level BCS team that we're travelling to play in a few years)
  4. Florida International (cupcake)
Ditch one of the Sun Belt teams, pick up somebody great and it's not so bad.

The 2007 out of conference schedule has the potential to meet my proposed scenario 100%:

  1. Florida State (marquee match-up)
  2. Houston (three bowl appearances in the last decade)
  3. Louisiana-Monroe (cupcake)
  4. TBA
With this proposed formula for out of conference scheduling, the following is achieved:
  1. Fans get a truly special, marquee match-up that will generate a national TV audience and have local fans clamoring for tickets. It will likely also help with recruiting because kids want to play in big games.
  2. Fans get two games against decent competition that the team should win, but won't end up with 63-6 score lines.
  3. A guaranteed win with the cupcake. Nobody wants to go "0-fer" for the season.


Bring it on Boise State!

So, even though it is a bit odd, I submit to you a mid-level team wish list that I'd like to see Alabama play rather than seeing them beat up on Utah State and Western Carolina.

Here's a list of 10 in alphabetical order:

  1. Army: I want revenge for the 1988 Sun Bowl.
  2. Boise State: Who doesn't want to play the smurf turf team?
  3. Marshall: It'd be fun to play another team whose nickname doesn't end in `s.'
  4. Memphis: Ole Miss and Tennessee play them frequently so why not?
  5. North Carolina: Maybe it'd help mid-Atlantic recruiting?
  6. Northwestern: I have several friends that are Northwestern alumni.
  7. Syracuse: I can only recall playing a few Big East teams in the last 20 years.
  8. TCU: I don't believe the two have met since the tragic mid-70s series that left a TCU player paralyzed.
  9. UTEP: It'd be fun to square off against Mike Price.
  10. Washington: 1926 Rose Bowl rematch!
I'd be interested to hear your wish lists for mid-level competition.

0 recs | Comment 5 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

revenge games
they aren't exactly upper mid-major material, but la tech and northern illinois are due some revenging.

by Todd on Jun 5, 2006 6:12 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Northern Illinois
Northern Illinois is on the schedule in 2008 and will hopefully be dealt with properly this time.

by Nico2.0 on Jun 5, 2006 7:58 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Lower-Level Teams
I totally disagree with the proposition that the NCAA have only inter-D1A games.  I don't like seeing big-time teams "waste" games on AA opponents, but the cupcakes need cupcakes, too.  If La-Lafayette wants to play a AA team, who cares?

The reason Army left C-USA was so they could schedule easier teams, including AA or even D2/D3 teams.  If a school is, like Army, committed to being D1A, but can't become truly competitive in the division, I don't see a problem with them playing lower-div. opponents.

If any change were made, I would suggest allowing I-AA games, but (like games against D2 teams) not having them count towards bowl eligibility.

by Jeff on Jun 6, 2006 9:48 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's a possibility
Having games against AA not count towards bowl eligibility would be a good compromise...or maybe at least not having them count towards BCS bowl eligibility would get the big dogs off of the 1-A teams, which is what I'm really after.

I don't care if Arkansas State plays a public high school from Branson, Missouri, but it does irritate me when top level BCS conference teams do it.

by Nico2.0 on Jun 6, 2006 3:49 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

D1AA competition
Jeff - I'm almost with you on scheduling D1AA teams but not having them count towards bowl eligibility (up until recently they didn't, which was why you didn't see so many on BCS Conference schedules), but if a school is committed to be D1A then that should include being competitive in D1A, whether it's La Tech or Alabama.  

by Todd on Jun 6, 2006 12:39 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog covering the Alabama Crimson Tide.
Start posting about the Crimson Tide »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Jeremyandshea1_small
RIP Steve McNair
P5230033_small
UT fans are more delusional than i thought...
Mbobmean_small
Happy Fourth of July
Me_in_sunny_clai_small
who's next
Bear-bryant_small
War Eagle Condo bust
Small
Evan Cardwell Done
Small
A Proud Generation
Mbobmean_small
BCS System: Hatch Sets Hearings on it
Rambo_small
Colin Peek
Small
Jordan hicks

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Managers

Large_hankwilliams_small Todd

Miltonf-788904_small outsidethesidelines

Eugene-gogol-bordello_small Nico2.0

Authors

Kleph_logo_copy_small kleph

26935420b_small PeteHoliday

Official Partner of CBS Sports