The Dennis Franchione Saga: Seedlings of Doom
On November 15, 1996, the #8 ranked Alabama Crimson Tide traveled to Starkville to take on a 3-5 Mississippi State team. An easy win was expected, but the game was surprisingly close, and in the end the Bulldogs pulled out the 17-16 victory with a fourth quarter field goal. The loss was the Tide's first ever loss in Starkville, the first time State had beaten Alabama since 1980, and only the second time they had pulled off the feat since the late 1950's.
Supposedly after the game, all hell broke loose between head coach Gene Stallings and athletics director Bob Bockrath in the Alabama locker room. Some stories at the time had Bockrath coming into the locker room after the game to talk to the Alabama players, or in other versions to talk to Stallings about his quarterback decision in the game (he had benched Freddie Kitchens following a costly interception deep in our own territory), and supposedly this made Stallings explode like the second coming of Mount Vesuvius. At the very least, the consensus scuttlebutt of the time had a fierce argument between the two breaking out after the loss, one that supposedly ended with Bockrath "running off" Stallings.
It's all a nice little story, but it may very well be untrue, and even if true it probably had little impact on Stallings' ultimate decision to resign.
In reality, Stallings had probably checked out long before the Tide made the trip to Starkville on that chilly mid-November night. Weeks earlier, when Alabama president Andrew Sorensen was in search of an athletics director, Stallings called Sorensen to give him his input on the situation. Stallings told Sorensen that he felt that former Alabama player and assistant Mal Moore should be hired, largely because he knew Moore quite well and thought that he could have a very productive work relationship with him. Moreover, Stallings expressed grave concerns over the potential hiring of Bob Bockrath (who most felt was Sorensen's leading candidate), as many of Stallings' contacts in Texas had some disturbing comments regarding him (Bockrath was previously the athletics director at Texas Tech, which ended with the NCAA investigators heading to Lubbock). Shortly after getting Stalling's insight on the matter, however, Sorensen disregarded all that Stallings had said and hired Bockrath as athletics director.
All told, Sorensen wanted to put the athletic department wholly under his control, and the hiring of Bockrath was the first step in achieving that goal. Together, both Sorensen and Bockrath shared a common belief that the athletic department was corrupt to the core, and controlled by a "good ol' boy" network consisting of former players, coaches, and alums. Hiring a former Alabama player and assistant like Mal Moore would have been the endorsement of the very thing that Sorensen sought to eliminate in the athletic department. Hence the hiring of Bockrath.
Once Stallings saw that he would be locked in a never-ending power struggle for control of the program with Sorensen and Bockrath, he resigned. The loss to Mississippi State likely had nothing whatsoever to do with his departure. Stallings decided to leave the minute that Bockrath was hired. But Gene was a class act about the situation, and only went into detail about his resignation years later after both Sorensen and Bockrath had left the university, so in the meantime the rumors of him being "run off" festered for years and years, regardless of whether or not they had any legitimate factual basis.
Perhaps some other coaches would have stuck around for a couple of more years, particularly considering the NCAA sanctions that were taking effect as a result of Antonio Langham's Bourbon Street bar napkin contract with an agent. But Stallings simply had no reason to stay, he'd done all there was to do. By late 1996, Stallings had been involved in major football for over 40 years, and had added a Super Bowl ring and three national championship rings to his personal collection. He had nothing left to prove, and there was no real reason why he should have stuck around and tried to beat his head against the proverbial wall with Bockrath and Sorensen. The fire was still very much there for Stallings -- if you remember correctly, after the Price firing in 2003 Stallings told Mal Moore that he would return and coach the team for another year or two on an interim basis, if he was so asked -- but he didn't need the headaches, so he rode off into the Texas sunset.
So, with the Stallings era officially coming to an end, Bockrath and Sorensen set out in search of a new coach. In searching for a new coach, generally speaking, they wanted a hire with no real ties to Alabama, an outsider who would come in with a new sense of direction and operation for the program. It has been very well documented that their first choice was Virginia Tech's Frank Beamer. I'm not sure that Beamer was a feasible candidate -- Beamer attended Virginia Tech and played football there three years, it would have been difficult to get him to leave his alma mater -- but nevertheless he was their initial choice. Aside from Beamer, there were very few other names that were mentioned for the job, which was largely because...
To the Alabama fan base, however, there was one choice and one choice only: Mike Dubose. He had all that they (we) were looking for. He was an Alabama graduate, he was one of Bear's Boys, he had been at Alabama forever, he had turned out several great defensive linemen, and he was regarded by many to have been one of the hottest assistant coaches in the country. Moreover, Alabama fans felt it was of the utmost importance to have a degree of continuity from the Stallings era, considering how well we had done during his tenure. After all, why go for a complete makeover of a program that had posted seventy wins in the previous seven seasons? Shortly after the news of Stallings' resignation became official, the university's athletic department was bombarded with letters, phone calls, faxes, and e-mails all urging Mike Dubose to be chosen as the next head coach.
Dubose, however, was the antithesis of everything that Sorensen and Bockrath were looking for in a coach. He was the epitome of everything they sought to eliminate in the Alabama football program. Yet they felt trapped in their decision. They felt that, given the unbelievable amount of support for Dubose generated from the fan base, they had no other option but to hire Dubose, which is exactly what they did. In an ideal situation, from their perspective, Dubose would have probably never gotten a legitimate interview, and certainly would have never been hired. In reality, though, they felt the pressure on them was too great to do so, and they both feared the backlash that would have resulted in going against the current and hiring someone not named Mike Dubose.
The underlying problem was that neither Sorensen or Bockrath were the leaders needed to effectively run a football program. The problems were evident with Dubose, even when only looking surface deep. He had no previous head coaching experience whatsoever, and had in fact only spent one year as a defensive coordinator -- which, incidentally, marked the worst year defensively Stallings had in his tenure at Alabama. Essentially, we just promoted a lifelong defensive line coach, which, for example, is the exact same thing Ole Miss would do with Ed Orgeron eight years later. Despite the adoration for Dubose by the fans, there was simply no reason why Dubose should have ever been selected to lead an elite program in the nation's toughest conference, particularly one that was operating under the effect of NCAA sanctions, but neither Sorensen or Bockrath had the leadership ability, much less the fortitude, to go against the grain, take the heat, and reject Dubose in order to get a quality football coach.
It was simply a case of where the insane took over the asylum. The leadership structure was simply not in place to prevent it from happening. Football fans are just that, fans, not decision makers. They (read we) are not qualified in any way to make football related decisions at the institutional level. They should have had little or no bearing on the ultimate decision as to who would be the next head coach, but the volume of their outpouring of support for Dubose resulted in Sorensen and Bockrath caving to the fan base, which resulted in the hiring of Dubose. They did not want him, and they probably knew his hiring was a mistake, but they did not have the fortitude or the leadership abilities to prevent it from happening. Either way, for better or for worse, Mike Dubose was hired as the head football coach at The University of Alabama.
Next up: A Powerhouse Implodes
0 recs |
19 comments
Comments
very interesting...
while i understand the reason this is written in a column fashion i would really appreciate some type of citations for this information. perhaps a links bibliography after the final installment or something.
i ask this less as a criticism of your authority on the subject but as a means to see some of the available material for myself and weigh it in my own mind.
by kleph on
Mar 3, 2008 1:43 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
I know...
by Nico2.0 on
Mar 3, 2008 1:58 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Dubose.......
by bammer on
Mar 3, 2008 3:24 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Very
by leftygunns22 on
Mar 3, 2008 4:39 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Stallings
Alabama football had never had a budget before, and Bockrath immediately gave us one. As a player during this time, it was noticeable in the apparel, training table, and the facilities. We brought in the majority of the money, yet every other program had either new facilities or major renovations.
Our opponents really took advantage of this in my opinion because they knew our facilities were old and they knew we weren't outfitting players the way we used to. It sounds insignificant, but trust me, things like this matter to 18 year old kids more than graduation rates.
Having known Coach DuBose quite well, I will say this about him. His hiring appeased all parties. He had the old school connections to satisfy the boosters and he wasn't a strong enough personality to tell the AD and President to back the F off when he needed to. I can remember countless team meetings during 1997-1999 when DuBose came in extremely frazzled. He spoke like a madman and we knew he was really being pushed around by "The Suits" as we called them. When it came to signing players, DuBose was not strong enough to put people in their place. We signed Luke Tucker and Tyler Watts in 1998 when neither one had a Division 1A throwing arm. We could have had Major Applewhite, but DuBose, as he did with a number of other signings, had to appease the gold ol' boy network and sign Tucker because his brother Lance had been a quarterback and was a current GA. Never should have happened. He signed players like Ray Marshall for inexplicable reasons. He moved stud running backs like Adam Cox to linebacker because, just as there was an assumption that black men couldn't play quarterback, there was (and probably still is) the idea that a white man couldn't play running back.
I could go on all day about this era because I lived it.
In turn, DuBose stopped being a good coach and our team really struggled to find leadership. DuBose also was too weak to control the boosters, which led to Ronnie Cottrell's hiring, which in turn led to the NCAA sanctions we received.
I still struggle when I think about this era because as a player on some of those teams, it was painful. A great number of kids who grew up loving Alabama football, grew to hate the sport. They lost faith in the Crimson Tide because they did not have a leader as a head coach. DuBose failed us, as hard as it is to say. We only won in 1999 because of the players from Stallings last great recruiting class of 1995. By 2000 we had no chance to be good. Our starting backfield missed all of spring practice. Andrew Zow had tremendous issues in his personal life. Workouts suddenly had an optional feel. The team was out of shape and several of the players were drinking and using drugs worse than any of the fraternities. It was absolutely horrible and it happened because DuBose had lost the team.
I guess this is the reason why I haven't been back to Tuscaloosa since I graduated, and I will probably never will return. My wife knows how much it bothers me, and encourages me to forget about it. But I can't.
It never should have happened. If I saw some of those guys on the street, I would have a few words and more for them.
by Bamagrad on
Mar 3, 2008 5:08 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Oops
I should have proofread this message, sorry. I meant to say that our starting backfield missed all of spring practice, and then a couple of the players didn't participate in summer workouts, yet they still were starters at UCLA.
Guys weren't showing up to Pass Scale; guys weren't lifting; guys were getting drunk and high with reckless abandon, all because of the assumption that we were going to be a BCS team in 2000.
If you want to be a BCS team, you have to work like one. You have to work harder, but no one preached this that year. It was horrible
by Bamagrad on
Mar 3, 2008 5:14 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's obvious
by bamavicki on
Mar 3, 2008 6:11 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Well,
by Cam on
Mar 3, 2008 7:43 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hate it!
Roll Tide!
by TexasTideGirl on
Mar 3, 2008 9:20 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
vs ucla
we went in ranked number three and ucla - a seven-loss team from the season prior - simply made us look bad. after the game dubose had the gall to insist that "the national championship is still in the picture for us" when it was clear to anyone who watched the game he had completely lost the team.
i'd buy the analysis that the team was not in shape mentally or physically as a major factor in the loss but that, in the end, has to be laid at the feet of the head coach. kids are kids and the coach's job it to make them a team. dubose did not.
and dubose did nothing during the course of the contest to bolster his reputation as a savy game manager either.
by kleph on
Mar 3, 2008 5:38 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
It's all
Anyway, I think all of this is more reason why Alabama has needed a no-nonsense guy like Nick Saban for a long time. I love the fact that he calls players p**ies and demands that they play his way. I love that he cusses at some of the administrative people who ask him for promotional time. I love the fact that he turns down invitations to golf.
DuBose always gave in to these requests and look what happened. I remember hearing one of my coaches gripe, "God dm it, we always got to do this bull *** here" in reference to some evening event with the boosters. I knew what he meant because at other schools, it's different. Coaches are allowed to coach. They cut down on the extra-curricular crap that takes up valuable time that could be better used training, scouting, planning, watching film, whatever. At Bama, some people actually compete to have access to the team that they don't deserve to have. This is a distraction.
A football coach/player comes to the University of Alabama to work hard and win games. They're not there to play golf, have dinner, tell stories, or whatever other crap the boosters and fanbase want them to do when they should be working.
This is still not handled the way it needs to be. I remember reading in a TSN article before the season about how Saban had to turn down a ridiculous number of golf requests (more than he'd ever had before at any of his other coaching stops) and I thought, "God, they still don't get it, do they? Let the coach work."
by Bamagrad on
Mar 3, 2008 6:05 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
on the other hand...
i'm very interested on if this analysis will stretch to post franchone/price at all. while i have no intention of defending shula as a coach (or as a quarterback having had him stab me in the guts during the 86 campaign) i do understand how his tenure was a necessary step to where we are trying to get now.
oddly, the person i credit this with is robert witt. i witnessed him handle another gigantic shitstorm firsthand a few years prior at the university of texas at arlington. his strategy then was to do as much as possible to calm the waters and systematically make the necessary steps to allow building down the road.
as much as people demanded a silver bullet response that would fix everything, it wasn't going to be possible and he knew that. he caught a lot of heat but he was right and the university was much better off for it.
so seeing him choose a vanilla coach who would allow the program to recuperate, get off probation and not break the bank was a classic witt move in my estimation. the time for an asskicker like saban was not then and the potential downside - given the last two hires - was too extreme.
which certainly isn't to say i've enjoyed the brand of football bama has produced in this period. but, as some experts have observed, there is substantial reason to be optimistic.
by kleph on
Mar 3, 2008 7:25 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Great article
I was one of the ones who wanted Dubose. Boy was I dumb!! And you are right we won an SEC on the backs of Shaun Alexander, Chris Samuels and a few other guys Stallings had signed--and really some luck at Fla.
What is amazing is that through all this junk Bama fans have remained loyal. For a program that had been a top 10 almost every year and then to start losing to all kinds of people like La Tech and Central Florida the fans never gave up. And now...maybe finally, for the 1st time since Stallings left we have a football coach. Hopefully he will stay a while, but even if he leaves please Bama people and University "suits" learn from the past and no more Bockraths, Duboses, Prices, and Shulas. Even Fran was a dumb move. We are Alabama and we can have the best. And I sure hope we get Ozzie Newsome.
by 5026 on
Mar 3, 2008 7:28 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Bamagrad ...
by steeldueler on
Mar 4, 2008 9:59 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Another first timer
by jtCRIMSON on
Mar 4, 2008 1:03 PM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Not only....
In my mind, an ideal transition (that would have logically built on the success of the Stallings years) would have been to hand the reins to Bill Oliver, who had been a head coach before and probably would have done quite well in the position. Of course, he took himself out of the running by decamping for Auburn earlier that year. I never really understood what happened there - I think that would be a good topic for one of these in-depth articles.
by Dignan on
Mar 5, 2008 10:35 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs
Bill Oliver
by kennybk483 on
Mar 5, 2008 12:00 PM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Prior HC Experience
by outsidethesidelines on
Mar 6, 2008 12:03 AM CST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
OTS dominates again
This is a great series and why RBR is one of my "must-read" sites.
I have to say: reading Rammer Jammer gave me a little nostalgia for the Dubose years, as a fan who was frankly not following the team during those years. Beating Florida twice ain't never bad . . .
by gorjus on
Mar 5, 2008 11:47 AM CST
reply
actions
0 recs













